Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2025

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
Identifying environmental factors and biological metrics associated with cancer prevalence and mortality: An
Zongyuan Li1, Cheng Yu2, Jianqi Hao2
1Department of Thoracic Surgery and Institute of Thoracic Oncology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China; West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Background:
Present knowledge about determinants of oncogenesis and cancer mortality remains incomplete, inconsistent, and controversial. We aimed to conduct an environment-wide association study (EWAS) to systematically investigate and tentatively validate correlations of environmental factors and biological metrics with prevalence and mortality of cancer.
Methods:
All eligible participants were selected from the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) and randomly split into training and testing sets by survey years. Environmental and biological exposures were assessed through either physical examinations or laboratory tests. We conducted survey-weighted logistic regression and COX proportional hazards regression models to investigate the relationships of 398 factors with cancer prevalence and 380 factors with cancer mortality, respectively. To adjust for multiple comparisons, positive findings in the training set (false discovery rate [FDR] < 5 %) were tentatively validated in the testing set (P value < 0.05). Random forest models were further fitted to evaluate the importance and diagnostic value of identified factors in relation to cancer prevalence.
Results:
Overall, 55,021 general participants and 5163 cancer survivors were included in the study of cancer prevalence and mortality, respectively. After adjusting potential confounders, we identified 7 environmental or biological factors (e.g. total bilirubin, testosterone, and beta-cryptoxanthin) associated with cancer prevalence in the general population, as well as 21, 8, and 6 indicators associated with all-cause (e.g. C-reactive protein), cancer-specific (e.g. blood selenium), and noncancer mortality (e.g. albumin) among individuals with cancer, respectively. EWAS-identified factors contributed to better performance of random forest models in predicting cancer prevalence.
Conclusions:
Employing an EWAS approach, this study provided novel insights into potential targets for prevention and control of cancer.
More Related Videos
09:44Generation of Organ-conditioned Media and Applications for Studying Organ-specific Influences on Breast Cancer Metastatic Behavior
Published on: June 13, 2016
07:49Global and Current Research Trends of Single-Cell Sequencing in Cancer: A Bibliometric and Visualization Study
Published on: April 18, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Prevention
Some...
The Tumor Microenvironment
Cancer Survival Analysis
Gene-Environment Interactions
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Background and Environment Affect Phenotype
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...