Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2025

07:11
Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants
Published on: May 23, 2020
7.2K
Virtual surgical planning and customized subperiosteal implants: a systematic review
1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Centre Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
|April 22, 2025
Summary
Digitally manufactured subperiosteal implants (SPIs) show high success rates and patient satisfaction for severely atrophic jaws. While early complications like pain occur, late failures are infrequent, making SPIs a viable option.
Area of Science:
- Dental Implantology
- Biomaterials Engineering
- Digital Dentistry
Background:
- Subperiosteal implants (SPIs) offer solutions for severe jaw atrophy.
- Digital workflows enhance implant manufacturing precision.
- Evaluating the clinical outcomes of digitally produced SPIs is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review the indications, performance, osseointegration, and safety of digitally manufactured SPIs.
- To categorize and analyze early and late biological and mechanical complications.
- To assess the viability of SPIs in patients with severely atrophic jaws.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of PubMed and Embase databases (2018-2023) following PRISMA guidelines.
- Quality assessment using JBI and NIH tools.
- Analysis of 24 articles reporting on 246 subperiosteal implants.
Main Results:
- High implant functionality (97.6%) and survival rates (94.1-100%) after a mean 17-month follow-up.
- Common early complications: pain (25%) and swelling (24%). Infrequent late complications and implant removal (5 failures).
- Partial implant exposure noted in 37%; positive reports on success, satisfaction, and aesthetics, though infrequent.
Conclusions:
- Digitally manufactured SPIs are a viable treatment option for severely atrophic jaws, particularly in elderly or medically compromised patients.
- Further research with larger cohorts and longer follow-up periods is necessary to confirm long-term safety and efficacy.
- No single method for enhancing osseointegration demonstrated clear superiority.

