Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2025

Ocular Kinematics Measured by In Vitro Stimulation of the Cranial Nerves in the Turtle
Published on: June 2, 2018
Cranial kinematics and prey-type effects in Amia ocellicauda feeding strikes
Katrina R Whitlow1,2, Callum F Ross2, Mark W Westneat2
1Biology, Saint Mary's College, Notre Dame, IN, USA.
None:
Variability in the biomechanics and kinematics of prey capture in vertebrates has been studied extensively, with evidence of multiple strategies for successful feeding in many taxa. Early research into suction-feeding strikes in fishes hypothesized that fish utilize a set of pre-programmed strike kinematics that cannot be altered once initiated. However, more recent evidence has demonstrated that teleost fishes not only deploy unique strike kinematics for different prey types, but they also alter their kinematics in response to a prey item attempting to escape. It has not yet been explicitly investigated whether non-teleost actinopterygians can also modulate the strike in response to different prey types. Here, we examined the kinematics of suction strikes in bowfin, Amia ocellicauda, a holostean fish most closely related to gars. We recorded Amia feeding on both feeder fish and worms, two types of live prey differing in evasiveness, using X-ray reconstruction of moving morphology. We found significant prey-type effects on the magnitude, timing and velocity of jaw opening, hyoid arch depression and pectoral girdle motions. These prey-type effects demonstrate that the ability to modulate feeding strikes evolved early in actinopterygian fishes and is possibly the ancestral state for jawed vertebrates.
Related Concept Videos
Predator-Prey Interactions
Fixed Action Patterns

