Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2025

08:54
In vivo Application of the REMOTE-control System for the Manipulation of Endogenous Gene Expression
Published on: March 29, 2019
7.0K
Brinkmanship in intragenomic conflict.
Patrick Kennedy1, Andrew D Higginson2
1School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, 24 Tyndall Avenue, Bristol BS8 1TQ, UK.
Proceedings. Biological Sciences
|April 23, 2025
Summary
Genes in genomic imprinting conflicts exploit risk-taking strategies to gain advantages. Differences in risk appetite, influenced by kin selection, determine which genes prevail in these "wars of nerve".
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary Biology
- Genetics
- Game Theory
Background:
- Intragenomic conflicts arise when genes within a genome have competing Darwinian interests.
- Social evolution research suggests these conflicts influence diverse phenotypes, but the winning mechanisms are unclear.
- Genomic imprinting, where parental alleles are expressed differently, is a key area of intragenomic conflict.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the principles governing which genes win in intragenomic conflicts.
- To model how risk-taking behavior influences power dynamics between rival genes.
- To explore the role of kin selection in shaping gene strategies during conflict.
Main Methods:
- Utilized game theory to model interactions between rival genes.
- Focused on genomic imprinting as a specific case of intragenomic conflict.
- Analyzed how differences in risk appetite affect gene coercion and countermoves.
Main Results:
- Genes with a higher appetite for risk gain coercive advantages by exploiting the body's vulnerability.
- Kin selection creates divergent risk appetites; maternal genes may risk more for collateral benefits.
- Developmental risks, seemingly maladaptive, can be adaptive for 'higher-nerve' genes in conflict.
Conclusions:
- Risk appetite is a determinant of gene power in intragenomic conflicts, alongside other principles.
- Strategic risk-taking by genes can deter countermoves from rivals.
- Further empirical research is needed to understand the role of intragenomic brinkmanship in imprinting-related disorders.
Keywords:
brinkmanshipdeterrencedevelopmental disordersgenomic imprintinginclusive fitnessintragenomic conflictwar of nervesMore Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Robbers Cave
14.2K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.2K
Conservative Site-specific Recombination and Phase Variation
5.9K
Because the DNA segments are cut and reorganized in a direction-specific manner, site-specific recombination has emerged as an efficient genetic engineering technique. Flippase and Cyclization recombinases or Flp and Cre, respectively, are two members of the tyrosine recombinase family derived from bacteriophages, that are used to mediate site-specific DNA insertions, deletions, and targeted expression of proteins in mammalian cell lines.
The recognition sites for Cre recombinase called LoxP...
The recognition sites for Cre recombinase called LoxP...
5.9K
Hybrid Zones
16.6K
Hybrid zones are narrow regions where two closely related species interact, mate, and produce hybrids. Relative to either parent species, hybrids may possess distinct phenotypic or genetic differences that impact their survival and reproductive success. The genetic variances introduced by hybridization influence species diversity and speciation processes within the hybrid zone.
16.6K
Competition
21.2K
When organisms require the same limited resources within an environment, they may have to compete for them. Competition is a net-negative interaction. Even if two competing individuals or populations do not interact directly, the overall fitness of both competitors is lowered as a result of not having full access to the limited resource.
21.2K
Restarting Stalled Replication Forks
5.7K
DNA replication is initiated at sites containing predefined DNA sequences known as origins of replication. DNA is unwound at these sites by the minichromosome maintenance (MCM) helicase and other factors such as Cdc45 and the associated GINS complex.The unwound single strands are protected by replication protein A (RPA) until DNA polymerase starts synthesizing DNA at the 5’ end of the strand in the same direction as the replication fork. To prevent the replication fork from falling apart,...
5.7K
Crossing Over
4.0K
Crossing over is the exchange of genetic information between homologous chromosomes during prophase I of meiosis I. Genetic recombination gives rise to allelic diversity in the newly formed daughter cells. In humans, crossing over produces genetically distinct haploid egg and sperm cells that undergo fertilization to produce unique offspring. Before cell division starts, the germ cell’s chromosome(s) undergo duplication in the S phase of the cell cycle. As the cells enter prophase I,...
4.0K

