Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2025

Tissue Triage and Freezing for Models of Skeletal Muscle Disease
Published on: July 15, 2014
Time to Thrombolytics and Tissue Salvage: Assessing Response Following Severe Frostbite Injury
Rachel M Nygaard1, Emily Colonna1, Rediat A Tilahun1
1Department of Surgery, Hennepin County Medical Center, Hennepin Healthcare, Minneapolis, MN 55415, United States.
Abstract:
Approximately 30% of severe frostbite injuries result in amputation. Thrombolytic therapy is used to reduce tissue loss following severe frostbite injury. This study evaluates factors impacting the effectiveness of thrombolytics using post-treatment perfusion imaging and amputation level as outcome measures. We hypothesize that categorizing thrombolytic-treated patients into full, partial, and nonresponders enable a nuanced evaluation of treatment effectiveness. A prospectively maintained frostbite database was reviewed for patients with post-rewarming perfusion deficits measured by Tc99 scans who received IV thrombolytics. Of 131 patients, 71% were full responders, 23.7% were partial responders, and 5.3% were nonresponders for surgical outcome. The median time to thrombolytics was 5.5 h (range 1-14.5) for full responders; 7 h (range 3.5-14) for partial responders; and 10 h (range 1.5-11.5) for nonresponders. Full responders exhibited smaller initial perfusion deficits. Psychosocial or comorbid factors were not significantly different across groups. Nonresponse was associated with a longer time to thrombolytics, larger perfusion deficits, and cellulitis/infection. Using imaging outcomes to reduce confounding by infection, 93 patients were evaluated: 28% were full responders, 57% were partial responders, and 15% were nonresponders. Full responders for imaging outcomes corresponded with surgical outcomes and had no amputations, while 37.7% of partial responders and 42.9% of nonresponders on imaging outcomes had amputations. This study is the largest to evaluate thrombolytic outcomes in severe frostbite-injured patients, showing nearly 95% of patients improve after thrombolytic treatment for severe frostbite injury. This provides new insight into thrombolytic responses and a novel assessment of thrombolytic treatment efficacy. These findings underscore the importance of timely thrombolytic administration and demonstrate benefits for patients treated outside the standard thrombolytic treatment windows.
Related Concept Videos
Clot Retraction and Fibrinolysis
Coagulation
During the coagulation phase, clotting factors, or procoagulants, play a vital role in initiating and progressing the coagulation cascade. This cascade is a series of reactions...
Introduction to Hemostasis
The three phases of hemostasis involve many clotting factors present in plasma and several substances released by platelets and injured tissue cells. It is a fast, localized,...
Decreased Body Temperature
Flail Chest-II
Assessment:
1. Clinical Evaluation:
History:
Vascular Spasm

