Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview01:08

Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview

852
In bromoethane, the three methyl protons are coupled to the two methylene protons that are three bonds away. In accordance with the n+1 rule, the signal from the methyl protons is split into three peaks with 1:2:1 relative intensities. The methylene protons appear as a quartet, with the relative intensities of 1:3:3:1.
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
852
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)01:20

Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)

913
Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
913
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling01:17

Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling

911
Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
911
Reduced Mass Coordinates: Isolated Two-body Problem01:12

Reduced Mass Coordinates: Isolated Two-body Problem

1.2K
In classical mechanics, the two-body problem is one of the fundamental problems describing the motion of two interacting bodies under gravity or any other central force. When considering the motion of two bodies, one of the most important concepts is the reduced mass coordinates, a quantity that allows the two-body problem to be solved like a single-body problem. In these circumstances, it is assumed that a single body with reduced mass revolves around another body fixed in a position with an...
1.2K
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling01:08

NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling

1.1K
The spin state of an NMR-active nucleus can have a slight effect on its immediate electronic environment. This effect propagates through the intervening bonds and affects the electronic environments of NMR-active nuclei up to three bonds away; occasionally, even farther. This phenomenon is called spin–spin coupling or J-coupling. Coupling interactions are mutual and result in small changes in the absorption frequencies of both nuclei involved. While nuclei of the same element are involved...
1.1K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)01:22

Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)

1000
Vicinal or three-bond coupling is commonly observed between protons attached to adjacent carbons. Here, nuclear spin information is primarily transferred via electron spin interactions between adjacent C‑H bond orbitals. This generally favors the antiparallel arrangement of spins, so 3J values are usually positive.
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the...
1000

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Perturbative Super-CI Approach for Orbital Optimization in Two-Component Relativistic CASSCF.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2026
Same author

The traditional Chinese medicine bloodletting therapy at the Taiyang acupoint (No.EX-HN5) for the treatment of periorbital venous malformation: a case report.

Frontiers in ophthalmology·2026
Same author

A reduced-cost third-order algebraic diagrammatic construction method based on state-specific frozen natural orbitals: Application to the electron-attachment problem.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same author

Electron Attachment-Induced Shape Resonances in AT Base Pairs.

The journal of physical chemistry. A·2026
Same author

Breaking the Trade-Off of Mechanical Robustness and Energy Storage Capacity in Phase Change Materials Through a Molecular Design Strategy of Hard-Segment-Anchored/Side-Chain-Storage.

Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)·2026
Same author

A Study on the Correlation Between Driving Behavior and ECG Data in Driving Fatigue.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 14, 2025

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry
12:11

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry

Published on: April 8, 2020

8.1K

Frozen Natural Spinors for Cholesky Decomposition-Based Two-Component Relativistic Coupled Cluster Method.

Somesh Chamoli1, Xubo Wang2, Chaoqun Zhang3

  • 1Department of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, Mumbai 400076, India.

Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
|April 23, 2025
PubMed
Summary

We developed a cost-effective exact two-component atomic mean field (X2CAMF)-based coupled cluster (CC) method using frozen natural spinors (FNS) and Cholesky decomposition (CD). This approach achieves high accuracy comparable to four-component methods at a significantly reduced computational cost.

More Related Videos

Coulomb Explosion Imaging as a Tool to Distinguish Between Stereoisomers
08:51

Coulomb Explosion Imaging as a Tool to Distinguish Between Stereoisomers

Published on: August 18, 2017

9.0K
Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser
09:00

Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser

Published on: June 28, 2018

9.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 14, 2025

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry
12:11

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry

Published on: April 8, 2020

8.1K
Coulomb Explosion Imaging as a Tool to Distinguish Between Stereoisomers
08:51

Coulomb Explosion Imaging as a Tool to Distinguish Between Stereoisomers

Published on: August 18, 2017

9.0K
Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser
09:00

Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser

Published on: June 28, 2018

9.8K

Area of Science:

  • Computational Chemistry
  • Quantum Chemistry
  • Relativistic Quantum Chemistry

Background:

  • Accurate electronic structure calculations are crucial for understanding molecular properties.
  • Four-component relativistic coupled cluster (CC) methods provide high accuracy but are computationally expensive.
  • Efficient implementations are needed for studying large and complex systems.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present an efficient and cost-effective implementation of the exact two-component atomic mean field (X2CAMF)-based coupled cluster (CC) method.
  • To integrate frozen natural spinors (FNS) and Cholesky decomposition (CD) for reduced computational cost and memory requirements.
  • To demonstrate the method's accuracy and efficiency for relativistic systems.

Main Methods:

  • Exact two-component atomic mean field (X2CAMF) coupled cluster (CC) method.
  • Integration of frozen natural spinors (FNS) for reduced active space.
  • Application of Cholesky decomposition (CD) for efficient integral storage and transformation.
  • Calculation of a medium-sized uranium complex.

Main Results:

  • The FNS and CD approximation significantly reduces storage requirements without compromising accuracy.
  • The developed X2CAMF-CC method achieves accuracy comparable to canonical four-component relativistic CC methods.
  • The method is computationally efficient, demonstrated by calculations on a large uranium complex.

Conclusions:

  • The FNS and CD-based X2CAMF-CC method offers a highly accurate and computationally feasible approach for relativistic electronic structure calculations.
  • This method provides a cost-effective alternative to traditional four-component methods for complex systems.
  • The implementation enables the study of larger and more intricate relativistic molecules.