Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2025

07:36
Studying Cavitation Enhanced Therapy
Published on: April 9, 2021
5.1K
Infrasound uncertainty propagation: Ensuring traceability from the laboratory to the field
Samuel K Kristoffersen1, Séverine Demeyer2, Paul Vincent1
1CEA, DAM, DIF, F-91297 Arpajon, France.
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|April 23, 2025
Summary
This study presents a new method for calibrating infrasound sensors, improving measurement confidence for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization. Understanding measurement uncertainties enhances seismic and acoustic source analysis.
Area of Science:
- Geophysics
- Acoustics
- Metrology
Background:
- Accurate infrasound measurements are crucial for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization's global monitoring network.
- Estimating measurement confidence requires analyzing the entire process, from lab calibration to field deployment, including associated uncertainties.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a methodology for traceable measurements of infrasound signal azimuth, trace velocity, and amplitude.
- To present an in situ calibration method for infrasound sensors to ensure field traceability under diverse environmental conditions.
Main Methods:
- Developed a methodology considering the traceability chain and various uncertainty sources in the infrasound measurement process.
- Implemented an in situ calibration method at IS26 (Germany), complementing the Gabrielson on-site calibration.
- Analyzed standard uncertainties in azimuth (0.05°–7°) and trace velocity (0.2–60 m/s), and amplitude (0.2 dB).
Main Results:
- Standard uncertainties in azimuth and trace velocity were primarily driven by Gabrielson phase uncertainty.
- Amplitude uncertainty was significantly influenced by temperature and pressure susceptibilities.
- The study quantifies uncertainties for infrasound measurements, crucial for treaty verification.
Conclusions:
- The presented methodology enhances the understanding of uncertainties in infrasound measurements.
- Improved uncertainty quantification leads to more accurate source yield and location estimations.
- This work supports the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization's mission by increasing confidence in infrasound data quality.
Related Concept Videos
Interference: Path Lengths
1.2K
Consider two sources of sound, that may or may not be in phase, emitting waves at a single frequency, and consider the frequencies to be the same.
Two special sources may be considered when they are in phase. This can be easily achieved by feeding the two sources from the same source. An example would be synchronizing the two speakers by feeding them with the same source, such as the sound waves produced by a tuning fork. This setup ensures that the two sources have the same frequency and are...
Two special sources may be considered when they are in phase. This can be easily achieved by feeding the two sources from the same source. An example would be synchronizing the two speakers by feeding them with the same source, such as the sound waves produced by a tuning fork. This setup ensures that the two sources have the same frequency and are...
1.2K
Propagation of Waves
2.3K
When a wave propagates from one medium to another, part of it may get reflected in the first medium, and part of it may get transmitted to the second medium. In such a case, the interface of the two mediums can be considered as a boundary that is neither fixed nor free.
Consider a scenario where a wave propagates from a string of low linear mass density to a string of high linear mass density. In such a case, the reflected wave is out of phase with respect to the incident wave, however the...
Consider a scenario where a wave propagates from a string of low linear mass density to a string of high linear mass density. In such a case, the reflected wave is out of phase with respect to the incident wave, however the...
2.3K
Echo
467
The human ear cannot distinguish between two sources of sound if they happen to reach within a specific time interval, typically 0.1 seconds apart. More than this, and they are perceived as separate sources.
Imagine the sound is reflected back to the ears. Assuming that the source is very close to the human, the difference between hearing the two sounds—the emitted sound and the reflected sound—may be more than the minimum time for perceiving distinct sounds. If this is the case,...
Imagine the sound is reflected back to the ears. Assuming that the source is very close to the human, the difference between hearing the two sounds—the emitted sound and the reflected sound—may be more than the minimum time for perceiving distinct sounds. If this is the case,...
467
Sound Waves
7.7K
Sound waves can be thought of as fluctuations in the pressure of a medium through which they propagate. Since the pressure also makes the medium's particles vibrate along its direction of motion, the waves can be modeled as the displacement of the medium's particles from their mean position.
Sound waves are longitudinal in most fluids because fluids cannot sustain any lateral pressure. In solids, however, shear forces help in propagating the disturbance in the lateral direction as well....
Sound waves are longitudinal in most fluids because fluids cannot sustain any lateral pressure. In solids, however, shear forces help in propagating the disturbance in the lateral direction as well....
7.7K
Travelling Waves
5.0K
A wave is a disturbance that propagates from its source, repeating itself periodically, and is typically associated with simple harmonic motion. Mechanical waves are governed by Newton's laws and require a medium to travel. A medium is a substance in which a mechanical wave propagates, and the medium produces an elastic restoring force when it is deformed.
Water waves, sound waves, and seismic waves are some examples of mechanical waves. For water waves, the wave propagation medium is...
Water waves, sound waves, and seismic waves are some examples of mechanical waves. For water waves, the wave propagation medium is...
5.0K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
72.9K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.
72.9K

