Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 20, 2025

16:40
A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation
Published on: February 28, 2012
26.1K
Defibrillation Threshold Testing After ICD Implantation in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease
Rohit J Timal1, Lano Osman1, Joris I Rotmans2
1Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Cardiology and Therapy
|April 23, 2025
Summary
Defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is feasible and safe, with no increased risk of inadequate defibrillation. Routine DFT testing is not necessary for patients with advanced CKD.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Nephrology
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Routine defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation is not recommended due to lack of proven benefit.
- Patients with severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) were excluded from previous trials, leaving their DFT testing outcomes unaddressed.
- Current international guidelines do not specify the impact of kidney function on DFT testing in CKD patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the success and safety of DFT testing in patients with CKD stages 1-5 undergoing primary transvenous ICD implantation.
- To determine if chronic kidney disease affects defibrillation efficacy and safety margins during ICD implantation.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective study of 451 patients (ages 55-80) with CKD stages 1-5 undergoing primary transvenous ICD implantation.
- Patients were stratified into three groups based on CKD stage (1-2, 3-4, and 5).
- Ventricular fibrillation was induced 827 times to assess DFT success and safety.
Main Results:
- No significant differences in ICD defibrillation success rates were found across CKD groups (p=0.262).
- DFT-related complications occurred in 3.5% of patients, primarily hypoxemia and atrial arrhythmias.
- 1.1% of patients required ICD or lead revision due to abnormal DFT test results.
Conclusions:
- No correlation was found between CKD severity and increased DFT or inadequate defibrillation safety margins.
- DFT testing is a feasible procedure with a low risk of serious complications in CKD patients when clinically indicated.
- Routine DFT testing is not considered necessary for patients with moderate to advanced CKD.

