Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2025

03:01
Author Spotlight: A Reproductive Hysteroscopy Approach for Complete Endometrial Polyp Removal and Enhanced Endometrial Receptivity
Published on: August 2, 2024
492
[Ex-vivo Comparative Study on the Morcellation Efficiency of Different Morcellators]
Benedikt Becker1, Christopher Netsch1, Andreas J Gross1
1Abteilung für Urologie, Asklepios Klinik Barmbek, Hamburg, Germany.
Aktuelle Urologie
|April 23, 2025
Summary
The ActiveCut morcellator showed higher efficiency in removing prostate tissue than the Piranha device in an ex-vivo study. However, the ActiveCut
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Surgical Technology
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Anatomical enucleation of the prostate (AEEP) is a key treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).
- While laser enucleation has advanced, prostate tissue morcellation technology requires innovation.
- Limited advancements exist in morcellation devices used after AEEP.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the morcellation efficiency of the Piranha and ActiveCut devices.
- To evaluate blade deterioration and performance consistency of both morcellators.
- To assess the potential of a new morcellation device in an ex-vivo model.
Main Methods:
- An ex-vivo model using bovine heart tissue was developed.
- Two morcellators, Piranha and ActiveCut, were tested with reusable blades.
- Each device underwent ten morcellation trials using 60g of tissue per trial.
Main Results:
- ActiveCut demonstrated significantly higher morcellation rates (12.43 g/min) compared to Piranha (7.09 g/min).
- ActiveCut showed a decline in efficiency over repeated trials and experienced two instances of manual tissue removal.
- Piranha morcellator maintained consistent performance without malfunctions throughout the trials.
Conclusions:
- The ActiveCut morcellator offers higher initial morcellation efficiency in an ex-vivo setting.
- Further clinical studies are essential to evaluate the safety and reliability of the ActiveCut device.
- The Piranha morcellator provided consistent performance, highlighting the need for improvements in the ActiveCut device before clinical use.

