Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 4, 2026

Recognition of Epidermal Transglutaminase by IgA and Tissue Transglutaminase 2 Antibodies in a Rare Case of Rhesus Dermatitis
Published on: December 15, 2011
ICD-10-CM coding uncovers the gap between serological and clinically identified coeliac disease prevalence: A
Ivan Villar-Balboa1, Meritxell Regí-Bosque2, Jesús Almeda-Ortega3
1Centre d'Atenció Primària Florida Sud, Gerència Atenció Primària i a la Comunitat Delta, Institut Català de la Salut, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; Fundació Institut Universitari per a la recerca a l'Atenció Primària de Salut Jordi Gol i Gurina (IDIAPJGol), Barcelona, Spain; Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Background:
The International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) is a global health coding system that provides a standardised language for recording, reporting and monitoring diseases. However, epidemiological studies using real-world data on clinically diagnosed coeliac disease (CD) based on the ICD-10-CM remain limited.
Aims:
To evaluate in primary care: (1) the diagnostic adequacy of CD; (2) the accuracy of the ICD-10-CM code K90.0 for identifying CD; and (3) the prevalence of clinically diagnosed CD compared with the known CD seroprevalence in the same geographical area (5‰).
Methods:
This was a population-based, cross-sectional study in the city of L'Hospitalet de Llobregat (269,382 inhabitants), Catalonia, from 2005 to 2020. The data retrieved with the K90.0 code from electronic medical records were cross-checked against laboratory and pathology registries. The CD diagnostic criteria were validated on a case-by-case basis. To calculate the accuracy of the K90.0 code for identifying CD, patients were classified into confirmed versus uncertain/misdiagnosed CD.
Results:
Overall, 536/737 patients (73 %) had confirmed CD, and 201/737 (27 %) were misdiagnosed. The accuracy of the K90.0 code for identifying CD was as follows: sensitivity, 91.63 %; specificity, 99.95 %; positive predictive value, 63.85 %; and negative predictive value, 99.99 %. The prevalence of clinically diagnosed CD was 1.99‰, with a decreasing age-related trend of -7.5 %.
Conclusions:
The ICD-10-CM code K90.0 is accurate for identifying clinically diagnosed CD and is thus a great tool for epidemiological disease surveillance. The gap between CD seroprevalence and the prevalence of clinically diagnosed CD (5‰ vs. 1.99‰) calls for the implementation of case-finding programmes to reduce underdiagnosis.
Related Concept Videos
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.
Prevalence and Incidence
Prevalence indicates the proportion of individuals in a population who have a specific disease or health condition at a...
Investigation of Disease Outbreaks

