Tracking of Noise Tolerance Test Outcomes With the International Speech Test Signal
Christopher Slugocki1, Francis Kuk1, Petri Korhonen1
1Office of Research in Clinical Amplification (ORCA-USA), WS Audiology, Lisle, IL.
Using the International Speech Test Signal (ISTS) in the Tracking of Noise Tolerance (TNT) test impacted normal-hearing listeners more than those with hearing loss. This research explores acoustic and nonacoustic factors in noise tolerance.
Area of Science:
- Auditory Neuroscience
- Psychoacoustics
- Speech Perception
Background:
- The Tracking of Noise Tolerance (TNT) test assesses an individual's ability to tolerate background noise.
- Listener performance on the TNT test can be influenced by the nature of the target signal, whether meaningful speech or nonmeaningful stimuli.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate how using the International Speech Test Signal (ISTS), a nonmeaningful auditory stimulus, affects listener outcomes on the TNT test.
- To examine the relationship between TNT test results, hearing loss, and neurophysiological measures of central auditory inhibition.
Main Methods:
- A single-blind mixed design study involved 23 normal-hearing (NH) and 16 hearing-impaired (HI) older adults.
- Participants completed a modified TNT test using the ISTS as the target signal and dynamic background noise, with performance measured by noise acceptance (TNTAve) and noise level fluctuation (excursion).
- Cortical sensory gating magnitudes were recorded as electrophysiological indices of central inhibition.
Main Results:
- Normal-hearing listeners tolerated less noise with ISTS targets compared to English speech, while hearing-impaired listeners showed no difference in noise acceptance.
- Hearing-impaired listeners exhibited greater fluctuation (excursion) in noise levels with ISTS targets, unlike normal-hearing listeners.
- TNT excursion was strongly correlated with pure-tone averages, and sensory gating magnitudes predicted TNT excursion and noise acceptance, regardless of target type.
Conclusions:
- Replacing meaningful speech with nonmeaningful ISTS targets differentially impacts TNT test performance in normal-hearing versus hearing-impaired listeners.
- Comparing TNT results for meaningful and nonmeaningful signals offers insights into acoustic and nonacoustic factors influencing dynamic noise tolerance.
- Neurophysiological measures of central inhibition are linked to an individual's ability to manage fluctuating background noise during auditory tasks.
More Related Videos
06:04Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
Published on: March 24, 2023
09:09Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
Published on: September 27, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Sound Intensity Level
The human ear can perceive an extensive range of sound intensity, necessitating the use of the logarithmic scale to define a physical quantity—the intensity level. It is a ratio of two intensities and...
Echo
Imagine the sound is reflected back to the ears. Assuming that the source is very close to the human, the difference between hearing the two sounds—the emitted sound and the reflected sound—may be more than the minimum time for perceiving distinct sounds. If this is the case,...
Heart Sounds
Auscultation is the process of listening to these internal body sounds using a stethoscope. The heart produces four types of sounds, but only two—S1 and S2—can usually be heard with a stethoscope.
S1, also known as the "lub" sound, is caused by the closure of atrioventricular (A-V)...
