Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Repeated mild spinal cord contusions exacerbate tauopathy development in PS19 mice.

Acta neuropathologica communications·2026
Same author

Impact of a computerized intervention to optimize laboratory tests ordering: one-year follow-up in a geriatric unit.

Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine·2026
Same author

<i>CEBP</i> and <i>ZEB2</i> alterations define three distinct subtypes of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

HemaSphere·2026
Same author

A comprehensive multicenter study assessing the impact of abelacimab, asundexian and milvexian on coagulation assays.

Blood advances·2026
Same author

Jet ventilation and hemodynamic stability during pulmonary vein isolation: ventilatory and hemodynamic outcomes from a randomized controlled trial (Secondary analysis under EEG-Guided Total Intravenous Anesthesia).

BMC anesthesiology·2026
Same author

AdamiForge: a modular reverse genetics tool for human adenovirus type 12 (HAdV-A12).

Microbiology spectrum·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 10, 2025

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.1K

Prediction of Lymphoma Aggressiveness Using Machine Learning Algorithms.

Julien Cabo1, Benoît Bihin2, Nicolas Debortoli3

  • 1Université Catholique de Louvain, CHU UCL Namur, Namur Thrombosis and Hemostasis Center (NTHC), Hematology Laboratory, Yvoir, Belgium.

International Journal of Laboratory Hematology
|April 24, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Combining lymph node cytology (LNC) and flow cytometry (FC) with other clinical data in multivariable models can accurately predict aggressive lymphomas. This approach offers valuable diagnostic information for prompt treatment initiation while awaiting definitive pathology results.

Keywords:
aggressive lymphomaensemble learning algorithmslymph node cytologymachine learningpredictive modeling

More Related Videos

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

6.6K
Predictive Immune Modeling of Solid Tumors
08:50

Predictive Immune Modeling of Solid Tumors

Published on: February 25, 2020

6.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 10, 2025

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.1K
Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

6.6K
Predictive Immune Modeling of Solid Tumors
08:50

Predictive Immune Modeling of Solid Tumors

Published on: February 25, 2020

6.8K

Area of Science:

  • Hematology
  • Oncology
  • Diagnostic Pathology

Background:

  • Lymph node examination is crucial for diagnosing lymphoid neoplasms, metastases, and infections.
  • Aggressive lymphomas, such as aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL), require urgent diagnosis.
  • Integrating various diagnostic parameters can provide timely information for patient management.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate multivariable predictive models for identifying aggressive lymphomas.
  • To assess the diagnostic value of combining lymph node cytology (LNC) and flow cytometry (FC) with other clinical parameters.
  • To improve diagnostic efficiency in cases requiring urgent lymphoma assessment.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 196 lymph node specimens.
  • Inclusion of parameters: age, sex, LNC, FC, positron emission tomography scan, lymphocytosis, leukocytosis, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and hemoglobin.
  • Construction of five multivariable models: three logistic regression models and two ensemble learning models (bagging and boosting).
  • Performance evaluation using 10-fold cross-validation, including sensitivity, specificity, and AUC.

Main Results:

  • Multivariable models demonstrated superior performance (AUCs 0.88–0.94) compared to individual variables (AUCs 0.69–0.87).
  • The best-performing model (boosting) achieved a sensitivity of 77% and a specificity of 94%.
  • Rapidly available parameters, including LNC and FC, are significant predictors of lymphoma aggressiveness.

Conclusions:

  • Lymph node cytology, flow cytometry, and other readily available clinical data are associated with the aggressive nature of lymphomas.
  • Multivariable models integrating these parameters provide valuable diagnostic insights.
  • This approach facilitates prompt treatment initiation for aggressive lymphomas.