Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 4, 2026

Testing the Efficacy of Pharmacological Agents in a Pericardial Target Delivery Model in the Swine
Published on: July 7, 2016
Pericardiectomy with routine cardiopulmonary bypass: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial
Jing-Bin Huang1, Chang-Chao Lu2, Zhao-Ke Wen2
1Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Guangxi Academy of Medical Sciences, The People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, 6 Taoyuan Road, Nanning, Guangxi, 530021, China. hjb010222@163.com.
This study compares extracorporeal circulation pericardial resection versus conventional surgery for constrictive pericarditis. Results will guide treatment for this heart failure cause.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Thoracic Surgery
Background:
- Constrictive pericarditis involves pericardial thickening, impairing diastolic filling and cardiac output.
- Chronic inflammation leads to calcification, fibrosis, and eventual heart failure.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the prognosis of pericardial resection with and without extracorporeal circulation.
- To evaluate the efficacy of different surgical approaches for constrictive pericarditis.
Main Methods:
- Multicenter, randomized controlled trial.
- 436 participants assigned to extracorporeal circulation or non-extracorporeal circulation pericardial resection.
- Evaluator-blinded, parallel group design.
Main Results:
- Incomplete pericardial detachment correlates with low cardiac output syndrome.
- Key factors for recovery include complete resection and relief of ventricular compression.
Conclusions:
- Surgical technique significantly impacts outcomes in constrictive pericarditis.
- Optimizing pericardial resection is crucial for preventing postoperative complications and improving cardiac function.
Related Concept Videos
Pericarditis III: Medical Management
Cardiomyopathy VII: Pre and Post Operative Nursing Management

