Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2025

In Vitro Methods for Comparing Target Binding and CDC Induction Between Therapeutic Antibodies: Applications in Biosimilarity Analysis
Published on: May 4, 2017
How we manage immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura after rituximab failure or intolerance
Julia Weisinger1, Jehane Fadlallah1,2, Bérangère Joly1,3,4
1Centre de Référence des Microangiopathies Thrombotiques et Service d'hématologie, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris and Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
The use of rituximab, a B-cell-depleting agent as a pre-emptive treatment in immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP), is the current standard of care. However, for patients refractory to rituximab or for those with contraindications, further treatment guidelines are scarce. Standard immunosuppressive or chemotherapeutic agents were used routinely in the past, but most of the data proving their efficacy are stemming from experience before the routine use of rituximab. Ciclosporin A and azathioprine seem to be effective in the pre-emptive setting, but their safety profile might limit their use. Extended or intensive rituximab administration may overcome refractoriness in some patients. New therapeutic options, such as new generation anti-CD20 antibodies like obinutuzumab or the plasma cell-directed therapy daratumumab, showed important efficacy in iTTP after rituximab failure, with a favourable safety profile. There are no available comparative studies for pre-emptive treatment options in iTTP; therefore, data from large databases and multicentre studies are essential. In this review, we summarize the possible treatment options in case of rituximab failure in iTTP and try to provide a recommendation based on available literature and our own experience.
The use of rituximab, a B-cell-depleting agent as a pre-emptive treatment in immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP), is the current standard of care. However, for patients refractory to rituximab or for those with contraindications, further treatment guidelines are scarce. Standard immunosuppressive or chemotherapeutic agents were used routinely in the past, but most of the data proving their efficacy are stemming from experience before the routine use of rituximab. Ciclosporin A and azathioprine seem to be effective in the pre-emptive setting, but their safety profile might limit their use. Extended or intensive rituximab administration may overcome refractoriness in some patients. New therapeutic options, such as new generation anti-CD20 antibodies like obinutuzumab or the plasma cell-directed therapy daratumumab, showed important efficacy in iTTP after rituximab failure, with a favourable safety profile. There are no available comparative studies for pre-emptive treatment options in iTTP; therefore, data from large databases and multicentre studies are essential. In this review, we summarize the possible treatment options in case of rituximab failure in iTTP and try to provide a recommendation based on available literature and our own experience.
More Related Videos
12:36Single-cell Analysis of Immunophenotype and Cytokine Production in Peripheral Whole Blood via Mass Cytometry
Published on: June 26, 2018
09:34Dynamic Imaging of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells with [18F]Tetrafluoroborate Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography
Published on: February 17, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Immunomodulatory Agents
Inflammatory Bowel Disease IV: Pharmacological Management
Pharmacologic...
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Biologic Agents: Anti-TNF
Tumor Immunotherapy