Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2025

Sequence-specific Labeling of Nucleic Acids and Proteins with Methyltransferases and Cofactor Analogues
Published on: November 22, 2014
How to Tell an N from an O: Controlling the Chemoselectivity of Methyltransferases
Emely Jockmann1, Helena Girame2, Wieland Steinchen3,4
1Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Freiburg, Albertstr. 25, 79104 Freiburg, Germany.
Abstract:
S-Adenosyl-l-methionine (SAM)-dependent methyltransferases (MTs) are important enzymes in numerous biological pathways. They share a common S 2 mechanism but act on different nucleophilic substrates in vivo. Therefore, MTs have a specific chemoselectivity to transfer CH3 onto the correct atom type and substrate. Caffeate O-MT from Prunus persica (PpCaOMT) and anthranilate N-MT from Ruta graveolens (RgANMT) share a high similarity regarding their amino acid sequence (>74%). Nevertheless, the physiological substrates (caffeate vs anthranilate) and attacking nucleophiles (hydroxyl vs amino group) are strikingly different. We demonstrate that the differing chemoselectivity is governed by different conformational states of the two enzymes. O-Methylation catalyzed by CaOMTs requires a "closed" conformation, whereas ANMTs perform N-methylation in an "open" state. We rationally designed seven variants for both PpCaOMT and RgANMT, which changed their original nucleophile preference to different extents, up to a full inversion. Interestingly, the generated O-selective ANMT variant catalyzes O-methylation considerably faster than wildtype CaOMT. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and hydrogen/deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) experiments showed that the mutations induced changes in the conformational dynamics of the enzyme variants and by modulating the open/closed transitions impact the corresponding chemoselectivity. Our data show that the selectivity of the methyl transfer reaction is not solely governed by the key residues directly involved in the methyl transfer but is rather synergistically modulated by the conformational dynamics of the enzyme and reaction conditions.
Related Concept Videos
Phase II Reactions: Methylation Reactions
The mechanism of methylation unfolds in two stages. The first stage sees a methyltransferase enzyme facilitating the transfer of a methyl group from S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) to the substrate, forming S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH). The second stage involves further metabolism of SAH into homocysteine, which can be recycled...
Regioselectivity of Electrophilic Additions to Alkenes: Markovnikov's Rule
The hydrohalogenation of an unsymmetrical alkene can yield two haloalkane products, depending on which vinylic carbon takes up the halogen. However, one product usually predominates, where hydrogen adds to the vinylic carbon bearing the...
Directing and Steric Effects in Disubstituted Benzene Derivatives
Regioselectivity and Stereochemistry of Hydroboration
Hydroboration proceeds in a concerted fashion with the attack of borane on the π bond, giving a cyclic four-centered transition state. The –BH2 group is bonded to the less substituted carbon and –H to the more substituted carbon. The concerted nature requires the simultaneous addition of –H and –BH2 across the same face of the alkene giving syn...
Directing Effect of Substituents: meta-Directing Groups
Conservative Site-specific Recombination and Phase Variation
The recognition sites for Cre recombinase called LoxP...

