Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2025

09:17
Surrogate Model Development for Digital Experiments in Welding
Published on: March 28, 2025
559
Fluid Flow and Stress Field During Laser Cladding-Based Surface Repair of Aluminum Alloy: Multi-Track Simulation
Quan Wu1, Haiping Chu1, Zhongkui Liu2,3
1School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550001, China.
Materials (Basel, Switzerland)
|April 24, 2025
Summary
This study optimizes laser cladding (LC) for aluminum alloys by modeling melt flow and thermal stress. Findings reveal optimal parameters to repair surface flaws and suggest cooling intervals to prevent cracks, enhancing component repair quality.
Area of Science:
- Materials Science and Engineering
- Manufacturing Processes
- Computational Modeling
Background:
- Laser cladding (LC) offers potential for aluminum alloy repair.
- Challenges include melt flow instability, thermal stress, and resulting cracks/surface defects.
Purpose of the Study:
- Investigate multi-track laser cladding repair mechanisms for aluminum alloys.
- Optimize process parameters to improve repair quality and reduce defects.
Main Methods:
- Employed fluid flow and stress field models.
- Utilized finite volume method (FVM) for molten pool dynamics.
- Applied finite element analysis (FEA) for thermal stress evaluation.
Main Results:
- Optimized parameters (1600 W laser power, 600 mm/min scan speed) yielded stable melt pool (0.2 m/s velocity, 0.7 mm depth, 4 mm width).
- Surface flaws from 300-900 μm were effectively repaired.
- Multi-layer cladding generated >1300 MPa stress, requiring ≥3s cooling intervals to prevent cracking.
Conclusions:
- Adjusting laser power and scan speed controls molten pool stability.
- Implementing cooling intervals mitigates residual stress and cracking risks.
- Optimized LC process enhances repair quality for aluminum alloy components.
Keywords:
aluminum alloydefect formationlaser claddingmelt flowmulti-trackstress analysissurface repairMore Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Stresses under Combined Loadings
128
When analyzing a bent tube with a circular cross-section subjected to multiple forces, it is crucial to determine the stress distribution in order to maintain structural integrity under varied load conditions.
The process begins by slicing the tube at critical points and analyzing the internal forces and stress components at these sections, focusing on the centroid. Normal stresses, generated by axial forces and bending moments, are either compressive or tensile and vary across the section from...
The process begins by slicing the tube at critical points and analyzing the internal forces and stress components at these sections, focusing on the centroid. Normal stresses, generated by axial forces and bending moments, are either compressive or tensile and vary across the section from...
128
Stress: General Loading Conditions
279
To grasp the intricacy of real-world conditions where multiple loads are applied simultaneously to a structure, one might visualize a section passing through a specific point within a body, aligned parallel to the xy plane. This section is subjected to various forces, including original loads, normal forces, and shearing forces.
The shearing force, possessing potential directionality within the plane of the section, is simplified into two component forces running parallel to the x and y axes....
The shearing force, possessing potential directionality within the plane of the section, is simplified into two component forces running parallel to the x and y axes....
279
Stress Concentrations
253
Stress concentration is when stress intensifies near discontinuities such as holes or abrupt cross-sectional changes in a structural member. This localized stress can often surpass the average stress within the member. The stress distribution in flat bars, either with a circular hole or varying widths connected by fillets, can be determined experimentally using a photoelastic method. The results are based on ratios of geometric parameters like the ratio of the hole's radius to the smaller...
253

