Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2025

A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound
Published on: March 21, 2025
Hesitant bi-fuzzy multi-attribute information fusion with expert reliability
Shshank Chaube1, Anuj Kumar2, Manoj Kumar Singh3
1Symbiosis Institute of Technology, Hyderabad Campus, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, India. shshank.chaube@sithyd.siu.edu.in.
This study introduces a hesitant bi-fuzzy information fusion (HBFIF) method to improve multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) by integrating expert reliability (ER). The approach effectively handles conflicting expert opinions for more precise outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Decision Sciences
- Artificial Intelligence
- Operations Research
Background:
- Multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) requires expert input, but expert reliability and conflicting opinions can reduce outcome precision.
- Existing methods struggle to fully integrate expert hesitancy and conflicts while preserving original data integrity.
- Expert reliability (ER) is crucial for accurate decision outcomes in complex scenarios.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose a novel hesitant bi-fuzzy information fusion (HBFIF) method for MADM.
- To integrate expert reliability (ER) into decision-making frameworks, especially when dealing with conflicting expert information.
- To enhance the aggregation of expert preferences while preserving original data and risk preferences.
Main Methods:
- Developed a hesitant bi-fuzzy information fusion (HBFIF) method incorporating expert reliability (ER).
- Constructed a reliability metric based on the similarity of expert opinions.
- Utilized the power average (PA) operator and TOPSIS-inspired approach for data aggregation and opinion preservation.
Main Results:
- The HBFIF method effectively integrates expert reliability into decision-making processes.
- The approach successfully handles hesitant and conflicting expert information.
- Demonstrated applicability and effectiveness through selection of hydrogen storage methods for automobiles.
Conclusions:
- The proposed HBFIF method offers a robust framework for MADM with unreliable and conflicting expert data.
- Integrating expert reliability enhances the accuracy and integrity of decision outcomes.
- The method has practical relevance and applicability in real-world decision-making scenarios, such as automotive technology selection.
Related Concept Videos
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
The Availability Heuristic
Accuracy, limits, and approximation
Accuracy is defined as the closeness of the measured value to the true or actual value. In engineering mechanics, repeated measurements are taken during theoretical or experimental analyses to ensure that the result is precise and accurate.
The accuracy of any solution is based on the...
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals
The Representativeness Heuristic
Confidence Coefficient

