Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2025

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
Published on: February 16, 2011
Clinician and Patient Responses to US Health Insurers' Policies: A Qualitative Study of Higher Risk Patients
Tammy L Eaton1,2,3, Valerie Danesh4,5, Abigail C Jones6
1VA Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Objective:
To identify specific ways in which US health insurance triggered changes in care and interrupted the encounter between clinicians and patients in post-intensive care unit (ICU) clinics.
Study Setting And Design:
This naturalistic qualitative study was nested within a randomized controlled trial that evaluated the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a telemedicine ICU recovery clinic intervention. Adult participants were referred to a multidisciplinary ICU recovery clinic after septic shock or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in a Southeastern US academic medical center.
Data Sources And Analytic Sample:
Data were collected from 2019 to 2021. Telemedicine ICU recovery visits within the intervention group were used in this analysis. ICU recovery visits at 3- and 12-week intervals after hospital discharge were recorded and analyzed based upon the constant comparative method. Responses were initially open coded and then consolidated with the Donabedian Model of assessing healthcare quality by two investigators to organize themes and subthemes, with discrepancies in coding resolved by consensus.
Principal Findings:
Thirty-three clinic visit transcripts from 19 patients revealed health insurance-related issues commonly elicited by clinicians. One in three patients raised health insurance-related issues during their clinical encounter. Structural barriers to ICU recovery included high out-of-pocket spending, the complexity of interfacing with health insurance companies, and health insurance literacy. Patients initiated modifications to intended care to overcome insurance-related barriers to recovery, including nonadherence to prescribed medications and treatments and crafting unsafe "workarounds" to recommended healthcare, with consequences to their recovery.
Conclusions:
We found that health insurance complexity and high out-of-pocket costs compromise the quality of care and recovery experienced by ICU survivors. These findings emphasize the need for solutions at the policy, payor, and healthcare system levels to mitigate barriers to ICU recovery created by health insurance, which can adversely influence affordable, timely, and appropriate critical illness survivor care.
Trial Registration:
NCT03926533.
More Related Videos
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
14:43A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Introduction To Health Care Delivery System
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) advocates for a patient-centered, effective, safe, timely, equitable, and effective healthcare system. The National Priorities...
Standards of Care II
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's...