Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Information processing and speech lateralization in learning-disabled children.

J E Obrzut, A Obrzut, M P Bryden

    Brain and Language
    |May 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Footedness is a better predictor of language lateralisation than handedness.

    Laterality·2004
    Same author

    Handedness in mental retardation.

    Laterality·2004
    Same author

    Eye-dominance, writing hand, and throwing hand.

    Laterality·2004
    Same author

    Neuropsychological treatment of dyslexia in the classroom setting.

    Journal of learning disabilities·2004
    Same author

    Concurrent verbal and emotion laterality effects exhibited by normally achieving and learning disabled children.

    Child neuropsychology : a journal on normal and abnormal development in childhood and adolescence·2002
    Same author

    Lasting auditory attention impairment after persistent middle ear infections: a dichotic listening study.

    Developmental medicine and child neurology·2000
    Same journal

    Measuring language proficiency in bilingual children using EEG-based neural tracking of continuous speech.

    Brain and language·2026
    Same journal

    Corrigendum to "Inhibitory states modulate the processing of negated concepts in existential sentences. Evidence from ERPs" [Brain Lang. 105796].

    Brain and language·2026
    Same journal

    Evaluative processing of emotional and moral content during discourse comprehension: Insights from event-related brain potentials.

    Brain and language·2026
    Same journal

    Reading-selective areas in the cerebellum in adult readers.

    Brain and language·2026
    Same journal

    Effects of semantic distance and metaphorical constituent position on L2 noun-noun metaphor processing: an ERP study.

    Brain and language·2026
    Same journal

    Cortical tracking of natural speech by children with developmental language disorder (DLD): An EEG speech decoding investigation.

    Brain and language·2026
    See all related articles

    Learning-disabled children show weaker right ear advantage, indicating potential issues with speech processing lateralization. They also exhibit significant deficits in sequential processing, impacting language functions.

    Area of Science:

    • Neuroscience
    • Developmental Psychology
    • Speech and Hearing Sciences

    Background:

    • Learning disabilities are often associated with atypical information processing.
    • Cerebral lateralization, particularly for speech, is crucial for language development.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the relationship between information processing and speech lateralization in learning-disabled children.
    • To compare speech processing and lateralization patterns between learning-disabled and normal children.

    Main Methods:

    • Utilized the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC) for simultaneous and successive processing assessment.
    • Employed a dichotic listening paradigm with free recall and directed attention to assess speech lateralization.
    • Applied three-factor ANOVA and lambda analyses to dichotic data, and multiple-regression analysis for processing prediction.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Normal children exhibited a stronger right ear advantage (REA) compared to learning-disabled children.
    • Learning-disabled children showed a weaker REA, suggesting inadequate cerebral lateralization of receptive speech processes.
    • Learning-disabled children demonstrated a substantial deficit in sequential processing compared to normal children.

    Conclusions:

    • Learning-disabled children may have deficiencies in the cerebral lateralization of receptive speech.
    • These children might struggle with attentional shifting and exhibit inadequate sequential processing, crucial for language.
    • Potential underlying causes include deficiencies in the processor capacity of the left hemisphere's language areas.