Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bias01:22

Bias

3.7K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
3.7K
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data01:16

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

95
Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance,...
95
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

92
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
92
Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares01:20

Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares

1.1K
A calibration curve is a plot of the instrument's response against a series of known concentrations of a substance. This curve is used to set the instrument response levels, using the substance and its concentrations as standards. Alternatively, or additionally, an equation is fitted to the calibration curve plot and subsequently used to calculate the unknown concentrations of other samples reliably.
For data that follow a straight line, the standard method for fitting is the linear...
1.1K
Calibration Curves: Correlation Coefficient01:10

Calibration Curves: Correlation Coefficient

1.4K
In a linear calibration curve, there is a value called the calibration coefficient, denoted by 'r,' which measures the strength and the direction of association between two variables. The correlation coefficient value ranges from −1 to +1. A value of +1 indicates a perfect positive linear correlation, −1 denotes a perfect negative correlation, and 0 implies no correlation between the two variables. A positive correlation value establishes that as one variable increases, the...
1.4K
Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: Student t-Test and Goodness-of-Fit Test01:09

Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: Student t-Test and Goodness-of-Fit Test

1.5K
In parametric statistics, two fundamental tests stand out for their utility and wide application: the Student's t-test and goodness-of-fit tests. These tests provide researchers with a robust method for drawing insights from data, testing hypotheses, and making informed decisions based on their findings.
The Student's t-test is a statistical test that examines if there is a statistically significant difference between the means of two groups. This test is instrumental when dealing with...
1.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Generalized entropy calibration for analyzing voluntary survey data.

Biometrics·2026
Same author

Silicon nanocolumn-based disposable and flexible ultrasound patches.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Rhythmic lipid and gene expression responses to chilling in panicoid grasses.

Journal of experimental botany·2024
Same author

Wireless, AI-enabled wearable thermal comfort sensor for energy-efficient, human-in-the-loop control of indoor temperature.

Biosensors & bioelectronics·2022
Same author

How many people participated in candlelight protests? Counting the size of a dynamic crowd.

Journal of applied statistics·2022
Same author

Lipidome profile predictive of disease evolution and activity in rheumatoid arthritis.

Experimental & molecular medicine·2022
Same journal

Acknowledgment of Referees 2025.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Fast penalized generalized estimating equations for large longitudinal functional datasets.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Causally-interpretable random-effects meta-analysis.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Statistical inference for mean function of partially observed functional time series.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Subgroup identification via Interaction Tree and Mixed Model for Repeated Measures with application to Alzheimer's disease.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Finite mixtures of linear quantile regressions with concomitant variables: a solution to endogeneity in longitudinal data modeling.

Biometrics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 8, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.3K

Multiple bias calibration for valid statistical inference under nonignorable nonresponse.

Seonghun Cho1, Jae Kwang Kim2, Yumou Qiu3

  • 1Department of Statistics, Inha University, Incheon 22212, Korea.

Biometrics
|April 25, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces multiple bias calibration to address nonresponse bias in statistical inference. The method safely eliminates selection bias when true models are included, improving data analysis accuracy.

Keywords:
calibrationempirical likelihoodmissing not at randommultiply robust estimationpropensity scoreselection bias

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

1.9K
Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task
12:10

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task

Published on: March 4, 2022

2.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 8, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.3K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

1.9K
Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task
12:10

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task

Published on: March 4, 2022

2.4K

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Biostatistics
  • Survey Methodology

Background:

  • Nonresponse bias poses significant challenges to valid statistical inference.
  • Accurate statistical analysis requires robust methods to handle missing data and potential biases.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a novel statistical method for addressing nonresponse bias.
  • To eliminate selection bias in statistical inference using multiple propensity score models and empirical likelihood.

Main Methods:

  • The proposed method utilizes multiple candidate propensity score (PS) models within an empirical likelihood framework.
  • Multiple bias calibration is introduced, incorporating multiple working PS models into the empirical likelihood's internal bias calibration constraint.
  • Asymptotic properties of the method are investigated.

Main Results:

  • Selection bias can be safely eliminated under specific conditions: the true model must be among the working PS models, and their expectations must match the true missing rate.
  • The method demonstrates theoretical advantages in handling nonresponse bias.
  • Simulation studies compare the proposed method against existing techniques.

Conclusions:

  • Multiple bias calibration offers a robust approach to mitigate nonresponse bias in statistical inference.
  • The method provides a practical solution for real-world data analysis, as demonstrated by its application to body fat percentage data.