Comparing femtosecond LASIK and small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE)

This review compares two refractive surgery modalities, femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE), focusing on their efficacy, safety, postoperative recovery, and patient-reported outcomes. The aim is to provide an updated review of recent findings and identify areas for additional research to further optimize surgical outcomes and patient selection.

FS-LASIK and SMILE show excellent, comparable visual outcomes for the correction of myopia and astigmatism. SMILE may have a lower risk of dry eye and has no flap-related complications, while FS-LASIK provides quicker visual recovery. SMILE may offer superior long-term visual outcomes, particularly for high myopia. However, customized FS-LASIK (wavefront- and topography-guided) outperform SMILE in some visual metrics, including uncorrected visual acuity and reduction in higher-order aberrations.

FS-LASIK remains the gold standard refractive procedure due to its rapid recovery and predictable results, but SMILE offers advantages in preserving corneal biomechanical stability and potentially minimizing dry eye symptoms. SMILE may also offer improved long-term stability for patients at risk of myopic regression. However, a growing body of evidence suggests that wavefront- and topography-guided LASIK yield superior visual outcomes compared to SMILE. Additional long-term comparative studies are needed for different refractive treatment requirements.