Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2025

Emergency Undocking in Robotic Surgery: A Simulation Curriculum
Published on: May 20, 2018
Generalizability of Artificial Intelligence Assessments in Laparoscopic Surgery Simulation
Erin Kim1, Lindsay S Rosenthal1, C Yoonhee Ryder1
1University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Introduction:
The application of artificial intelligence (AI) in the assessment of procedural skills on a simulation platform using the global rating scale (GRS) has shown promise. Our team developed an open-source, low-cost simulation platform for the development of laparoscopic skills in low-resource settings, with skill assessment provided by video-based peer review and AI. The generalizability of AI trained on one procedure to evaluate general procedural skills within a single training system is unknown. This study examines the feasibility of generalizing AI-based assessments across procedures in a training system.
Methods:
AI was trained, with varied combinations of procedures, to score 111 laparoscopic performance videos of four procedures (57 salpingostomies, 20 appendectomies, 15 enterectomies, and 19 diaphragmatic repairs), using time and distance-based calculations. Predicted scores were generated using five-fold cross-validation and K-nearest neighbors, with both 5-class (scored 1-5) and 2-class (pass/fail) scoring systems. Videos were also scored in a conventional fashion using human video-based review, based on GRS competencies.
Results:
AI assessments achieved 42%-100% concordance with human reviews in the 5-class system and 68%-100% in the 2-class system, P = 0.005. Within the 5-class system, 100% accuracy was reached when AI trained on multiple procedures evaluated appendectomy. The 2-class system attained 100% accuracy in three procedures across the GRS competencies.
Conclusions:
AI assessment trained on procedures using video-based review evaluated laparoscopic skills across different procedures within a simulation-based training system. Dichotomizing scoring to pass/fail improved accuracy, while supporting the potential to assess procedural competence.

