Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Ex Vivo Treatment Response of Primary Tumors and/or Associated Metastases for Preclinical and Clinical Development of Therapeutics
Published on: October 2, 2014
Treatment at Academic Facilities Is Associated With Improved Survival in Late-Stage Colonic Neuroendocrine Tumors
Nicholas R Suss1, Sara Abou Azar1, Kelvin Memeh2
1Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Introduction:
Colonic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a rare disease entity requiring complex and multidisciplinary management, and the survival benefit of treatment facility type has not been determined.
Materials And Methods:
The National Cancer Database was queried from 2004 to 2021 to identify treatment trends and overall survival (OS) outcomes in patients with stages I-IV colonic NETs who underwent surgery at academic or non-academic facilities.
Results:
21,838 patients met the inclusion criteria; 71% were treated at non-academic facilities and 29% at academic facilities. Patients at academic facilities were significantly more likely to be younger (odds ratio [OR] 1.16), reside in a metropolitan area (OR 2.37), and travel farther for care (OR 7.35). Academic facilities were more likely to perform complex en bloc resection (OR 1.15) with more extensive lymphadenectomy (OR 1.42). Treatment at academic facilities was associated with a decreased risk of mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.89) on adjusted Cox models. Older age (HR 2.14), increased comorbidities (HR 2.22), uninsured status (HR 1.36), low socioeconomic status (HR 1.08), complex en bloc resection (HR 1.12), and increased nodal positivity (HR 2.42) significantly predicted increased mortality of the entire cohort; subgroup analysis found that low socioeconomic status and uninsured status were not significant predictors of survival at academic facilities. Kaplan-Meier analysis identified a benefit in median OS for those treated at an academic versus non-academic facility (161.1 versus 146.6 mo, P = 0.002). On subgroup Cox analyses by individual clinical stage, treatment at academic facilities was associated with a significantly decreased risk of mortality for patients with late-stage disease (stage III: HR 0.83, P = 0.005; stage IV: HR 0.84, P < 0.001); there was no significant difference in survival by treating facility type for early-stage disease (stage I: HR 1.05, P = 0.58; stage II: HR 0.87, P = 0.12).
Conclusions:
Treatment at academic facilities is associated with a survival benefit for patients undergoing surgical resection for late-stage colonic NETs. Further research is needed to understand these survival differences to bridge the gap in care for patients with colonic NETs.
Insights
Treatment at academic facilities improves survival for late-stage colonic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Further research is needed to understand these differences and improve care for all NET patients.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Surgical Oncology
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Colonic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare and require complex management.
- The impact of treatment facility type on survival for colonic NETs is not well-established.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if treatment facility type (academic vs. non-academic) influences overall survival (OS) in patients with colonic NETs.
- To identify factors associated with mortality in colonic NET patients.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of the National Cancer Database (2004-2021) for patients with stages I-IV colonic NETs undergoing surgery.
- Comparison of outcomes between academic and non-academic treatment facilities using Cox and Kaplan-Meier models.
Main Results:
- Patients treated at academic facilities had a decreased risk of mortality (HR 0.89) and improved median OS (161.1 vs. 146.6 months).
- A survival benefit was observed for late-stage (III and IV) colonic NETs treated at academic facilities, but not for early-stage (I and II) disease.
- Younger age, metropolitan residence, and longer travel distance were associated with treatment at academic facilities, which were also more likely to perform complex resections.
Conclusions:
- Treatment at academic facilities is associated with improved survival for patients with late-stage colonic NETs.
- Understanding the reasons for this survival difference is crucial for improving care and bridging gaps in treatment for colonic NET patients.
More Related Videos
09:01Non-invasive Assessment of the Efficacy of New Therapeutics for Intestinal Pathologies Using Serial Endoscopic Imaging of Live Mice
Published on: March 10, 2015
09:29Development and Maintenance of a Preclinical Patient Derived Tumor Xenograft Model for the Investigation of Novel Anti-Cancer Therapies
Published on: September 30, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Treatment Resistent Cancers
Cancer Survival Analysis