Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 19, 2026

Contextual and Cued Fear Conditioning Test Using a Video Analyzing System in Mice
Published on: March 1, 2014
Systematic comparison of Commercial seizure detection Software: Update equals Upgrade?
Johannes Koren1, Kady Colabrese2, Manfred Hartmann3
1Karl Landsteiner Institute for Clinical Epilepsy Research and Cognitive Neurology, Vienna, Austria; Department of Neurology, Clinic Hietzing, Vienna, Austria.
Objective:
To compare two updated commercially available seizure detection software packages (encevis 2.0 and Persyst 14) in a large video-EEG monitoring dataset comprising 80 patients with 6826 h of EEG and 912 seizures.
Methods:
We conducted a follow up study of two seizure detection software packages with a significant update since 2021 using different sensitivity settings.
Results:
Mean overall seizure count was 11.4 and mean tonic-clonic seizure rate was 0.7 per patient. Detection rates (DR) per patient were 80.7% to 89.1% for encevis 2.0 and 67.3% to 71.1% for Persyst 14. False positive rates (FPR) per day were 12 to 22 for encevis 2.0 and 2 to 4 for Persyst 14.
Conclusions:
Encevis 2.0 showed a significantly higher DR than Persyst 14, whereas Persyst 14 showed a significantly lower FPR than encevis 2.0.
Significance:
Updated FDA and CE certified seizure detection software showed opposite changes: encevis improved in sensitivity and deteriorated in FPR, while Persyst improved in FPR and deteriorated in sensitivity. In agreement with previous publications, automatic seizure detection software is ready for routine clinical use, but specialized personnel with sound neurophysiological knowledge and awareness of the strengths and weaknesses of the specific software package used is critical.
More Related Videos
08:13SwarmSight: Real-time Tracking of Insect Antenna Movements and Proboscis Extension Reflex Using a Common Preparation and Conventional Hardware
Published on: December 25, 2017
06:04Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
Published on: March 24, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Statgraphics
Comparison Tests