Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System III: X-Ray01:20

Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System III: X-Ray

113
The most common cardiovascular diagnostic test is an X-ray. It produces images of the heart, blood vessels, and adjacent structures.
Definition and Purpose
An X-ray, or radiograph, is a non-invasive method that uses ionizing radiation to take images of internal structures. It is mainly used in cardiac imaging to examine the heart, lungs, and major blood vessels, aiming to identify abnormalities in the heart's size, shape, and position, such as heart failure, congenital defects, and vascular...
113

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Diagnostic yield of algorithmically unclassified smartwatch ECGs in ambulatory care: The EQUAL trial.

Heart rhythm·2026
Same author

Gene expression profiles of carotid plaques differ between patients with amaurosis fugax and those with cerebral transient ischemic attack or stroke.

Cardiovascular research·2026
Same author

Voices of those recruiting: A qualitative study on barriers and enablers to women's participation in cardiovascular trials.

Atherosclerosis·2026
Same author

Sex differences in documented clinical features of memory clinic patients: a natural language processing study.

Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior·2026
Same author

Incorporating angina into the H<sub>2</sub>FPEF score improves diagnostic performance for HFpEF in women.

Open heart·2026
Same author

Sex differences in pharmacological treatment of heart failure: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.

European heart journal·2026
Same journal

Beyond the slope: prognostic utility of the VE/VCO<sub>2</sub> intercept in chronic heart failure.

Open heart·2026
Same journal

Impact of socioeconomic deprivation on early and long-term outcomes after major aortic surgery: insights from a 20-year single-centre cohort.

Open heart·2026
Same journal

Rethinking rate-related myocardial injury in sepsis: atrial fibrillation, heart rate, cardiac troponin T and long-term mortality.

Open heart·2026
Same journal

Treatment and control of low-density lipoprotein for primary prevention in patients in Wales with and without depression: a study of whole-population electronic health records.

Open heart·2026
Same journal

Equitable lipid optimisation through a data-driven, pharmacist-led secondary prevention pathway.

Open heart·2026
Same journal

Early versus delayed EKOS thrombolysis in intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism: a retrospective multicentre analysis.

Open heart·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 13, 2025

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.2K

Optimising coronary imaging decisions with machine learning: an external validation study.

L Malin Overmars1, Bram van Es2, Floor Groepenhoff3

  • 1Central Diagnostic Laboratory, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands l.m.overmars-2@umcutrecht.nl.

Open Heart
|April 25, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Sex-stratified machine learning algorithms using electronic health records (EHRs) show high negative predictive values for excluding coronary stenosis. While promising, further refinement is needed before widespread clinical use.

Keywords:
Angina PectorisChest PainCoronary StenosisDiagnostic ImagingElectronic Health Records

More Related Videos

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

6.6K
Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
06:16

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease

Published on: August 9, 2024

319

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 13, 2025

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.2K
Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

6.6K
Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
06:16

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease

Published on: August 9, 2024

319

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Medical Informatics
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Diagnosing coronary stenosis is challenging and current methods like CT and angiography are costly and invasive.
  • Electronic health records (EHRs) offer a potential non-invasive alternative for excluding coronary stenosis.
  • External validation of sex-stratified algorithms is crucial for assessing generalizability across different healthcare settings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To externally validate sex-stratified machine learning algorithms for predicting the absence of coronary stenosis.
  • To evaluate algorithm performance in diverse clinical settings using EHR data.

Main Methods:

  • Sex-stratified XGBoost algorithms were developed using EHR data from 14,674 patients.
  • Algorithms were externally tested on EHR data from 9,252 patients across 13 cardiology centers.
  • Absence of coronary stenosis was determined via text mining of radiology reports; performance was measured by negative predictive values (NPVs) and specificities.

Main Results:

  • In the training cohort, algorithms achieved NPVs of 0.95 (men) and 0.93 (women) with specificities of 0.14 (men) and 0.26 (women).
  • In the testing cohort, NPVs were 0.89 (men) and 0.87 (women), with specificities of 0.07 (men) and 0.18 (women).
  • High NPVs were observed across different settings, indicating strong predictive power for the absence of stenosis.

Conclusions:

  • Sex-stratified machine learning algorithms using EHR data can non-invasively predict the absence of coronary stenosis with high NPVs.
  • The modest specificity suggests limitations for immediate clinical adoption.
  • Further research and refinement are necessary before these algorithms can be widely implemented in clinical practice.