Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2025

Bronchial Thermoplasty: A Novel Therapeutic Approach to Severe Asthma
Published on: November 4, 2010
Does asthma pay-for-performance program really improve the quality of asthma care: a nationwide retrospective cohort
Pin-Kuei Fu1,2, Tsung-Hsien Yu3
1Department of Medical Research, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Background:
Asthma is a prevalent noncommunicable disease worldwide, imposing significant burdens and diminishing the quality of life for those affected. Pay-for-Performance (P4P) programs are reimbursement models that offer incentives to healthcare providers based on their performance metrics. While P4P initiatives have been implemented across various medical conditions, their specific impact on asthma care remains uncertain. This study aims to compare the characteristics and quality of asthma care between patients enrolled in the P4P program and those who are not. Additionally, we will examine trends in these characteristics and care quality over time.
Methods:
This study utilized a multiple cross-sectional design to analyze asthma patients diagnosed in 2010 and 2019, drawing data from Taiwan's National Health Insurance claims database. We collected information on demographic characteristics, P4P program enrollment, medication usage, healthcare service utilization, and attributes of both patients and their primary treatment hospitals. To address the study objectives, we employed logistic regression models and applied 1:1 propensity score matching to mitigate selection bias.
Results:
A total of 811,177 individuals diagnosed with asthma were identified, comprising 317,669 in 2010 and 493,508 in 2019. Our findings indicate that patients enrolled in the P4P program had higher prescription rates for inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and experienced lower rates of hospital admissions and emergency department visits for acute asthma exacerbations compared to non-enrolled patients. We also observed that demographic characteristics influenced P4P enrollment, with these impacts evolving over time. Furthermore, the effects of the P4P program varied across different levels of hospital accreditation.
Conclusion:
This study demonstrates that the P4P program positively influences the quality of asthma care. However, variations between P4P and non-P4P enrollers persist and have widened over time. Health authorities should address these disparities to ensure equitable care for all asthma patients.
Clinical Trial Number:
Protocol #202203101RINC.
Related Concept Videos
Asthma-IV: Nursing Management
First, in...
Asthma-IV: Diagnostic and Management
Clinical Assessment for Asthma:
This is the first step in diagnosing and managing asthma. It includes:
Asthma-III: Symptoms and Complications
Classification of Asthma
Chest Physiotherapy
Purpose
CPT is primarily used for patients with excessive bronchial secretions who have difficulty clearing...
Pulmonary Function Tests
Pulmonary Function Tests are crucial diagnostic tools for assessing respiratory function, particularly in patients with chronic respiratory disorders. They comprehensively evaluate lung volumes, ventilatory function, breathing mechanics, diffusion, and gas exchange. These tests help diagnose pulmonary diseases and play a significant role in monitoring disease progression, evaluating disability, and assessing response to therapy.
PFTs involve using a spirometer, a...
COPD: Management Using Bronchodilators and Corticosteroids

