Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2025

04:56
An Efficient Single—Person Technique for Milk Sampling from Laboratory Mice
Published on: March 28, 2025
440
Machine Learning Approach for Early Lactation Mastitis Diagnosis Using Total and Differential Somatic Cell Counts
Alfonso Zecconi1, Francesca Zaghen1,2, Gabriele Meroni1
1Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Milano, Via Pascal 36, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Animals : an Open Access Journal From MDPI
|April 26, 2025
Summary
Machine learning models using somatic cell count (SCC) and neutrophils + lymphocytes count/mL (PLCC) can help identify healthy cows at risk of intramammary infection (IMI). Further testing is needed for non-negative results.
Area of Science:
- Veterinary Medicine
- Animal Science
- Data Science
Background:
- Dairy production faces increasing herd sizes and milk yields, necessitating data-driven efficiency improvements.
- New technologies generate vast data, requiring advanced methods for information extraction.
- Intramammary infection (IMI) in dairy cows impacts production and requires accurate diagnostics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the accuracy of machine learning (ML) models using somatic cell count (SCC) and neutrophils + lymphocytes count/mL (PLCC) for identifying cows with intramammary infection (IMI) caused by major pathogens (MajPs).
- To compare the diagnostic performance of real-time PCR (qPCR) and conventional bacteriology for detecting MajPs in dairy cows post-calving.
Main Methods:
- A preliminary study involving 424 cows and 1696 quarter milk samples.
- Utilized machine learning (ML) algorithms to analyze SCC and PLCC data.
- Identified major pathogens (S. aureus, S. agalactiae, S. uberis, S. dysgalactiae) using qPCR and conventional bacteriology.
Main Results:
- qPCR detected a higher prevalence of MajPs compared to conventional bacteriology.
- Cellular markers (SCC, PLCC) showed high accuracy and specificity in diagnosing MajP IMI when using quarter milk samples.
- ML algorithms demonstrated similar performance regardless of the specific algorithm used.
- Both methods showed comparable negative result prevalence (~71-72%).
Conclusions:
- SCC and PLCC, analyzed with ML, show promise for identifying healthy cows or quarters, particularly due to high specificity.
- Confirmation of "non-negative" results via follow-up testing within 7-15 days is crucial for accurate diagnosis.
- Further research is needed to improve the overall diagnostic accuracy for IMI in dairy herds.

