Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Naturalistic Observations02:30

Naturalistic Observations

15.3K
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
15.3K
Bystander Effect02:09

Bystander Effect

9.4K
The discussion of bullying highlights the problem of witnesses not intervening to help a victim. This is a common occurrence, as the following well-publicized event demonstrates. In 1964, in Queens, New York, a 19-year-old woman named Kitty Genovese was attacked by a person with a knife near the back entrance to her apartment building and again in the hallway inside her apartment building. When the attack occurred, she screamed for help numerous times and eventually died from her stab wounds.
9.4K
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

59.0K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
59.0K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

8.8K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.8K
What is an Experiment?01:12

What is an Experiment?

10.0K
An experiment is a planned activity carried out under controlled conditions. The purpose of an experiment is to investigate the relationship between two variables. When one variable causes change in another, we call the first variable the explanatory or independent variable. The affected variable is called the response or dependent variable. In a randomized experiment, the researcher manipulates values of the explanatory variable and measures the resulting changes in the response variable. The...
10.0K
The Stanford Prison Experiment03:20

The Stanford Prison Experiment

22.7K
The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
22.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Education and research practices in Irish hospital pharmacies: a national service evaluation by the Hospital Pharmacists Association of Ireland Specialist Interest Group on Education and Research.

European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice·2026
Same author

Patient attitudes, beliefs, and practices in environmentally friendly inhaler disposal: a mixed-methods evaluation with behaviourally informed recommendations.

NPJ primary care respiratory medicine·2026
Same author

Child sexual abuse doll debate: Commentary on Cuvalo and Wekerle's (2026) and Salter's (2025) discussion papers.

Child abuse & neglect·2026
Same author

Authors' Response to the Letter by Sun et al.

Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy·2026
Same author

Blood Cancer Clinical Trials Long-term Follow-up Using Integrated Healthcare Systems Data (BLISS): protocol for a data-linkage study integrating randomised clinical trials with national healthcare systems data.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Considerations for the Role and Implementation of Reproductive Health Shared Decision-Making Interventions for Cystic Fibrosis: A Qualitative Investigation of Perspectives From Clinicians and Females With Cystic Fibrosis.

Pediatric pulmonology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 10, 2025

Measuring Light-Switching Behavior Using an Occupancy and Light Data Logger
05:50

Measuring Light-Switching Behavior Using an Occupancy and Light Data Logger

Published on: January 16, 2020

5.8K

To Intervene or Not to Intervene: An Experimental Methodology Measuring Actual Bystander Behaviour.

Danielle Labhardt1, Nadine McKillop2, Emma Holdsworth3

  • 1Faculty of Health and Education, School of Psychology, Manchester Metropolitan University, Brooks Building, Manchester M15 6GX, UK.

Behavioral Sciences (Basel, Switzerland)
|April 26, 2025
PubMed
Summary

This study developed a novel method to observe actual bystander intervention in simulated sexual assault scenarios. Findings show varied participant responses, highlighting the need for better training in recognizing and responding to sexual assault cues.

Keywords:
bystander interventiondeceptionexperimental methodologyfunnelling debriefsexual violence

More Related Videos

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
00:08

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

Published on: September 4, 2019

6.9K
Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory
07:59

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory

Published on: June 14, 2019

7.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 10, 2025

Measuring Light-Switching Behavior Using an Occupancy and Light Data Logger
05:50

Measuring Light-Switching Behavior Using an Occupancy and Light Data Logger

Published on: January 16, 2020

5.8K
A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
00:08

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

Published on: September 4, 2019

6.9K
Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory
07:59

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory

Published on: June 14, 2019

7.9K

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Criminology
  • Sociology

Background:

  • Bystander intervention and sexual assault research often use self-reported intent, which may not reflect actual behavior.
  • Hypothetical scenarios in research may not capture real-world complexities influencing intervention.
  • Measuring actual bystander behavior in response to sexual assault indicators is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate an innovative methodology for measuring actual bystander behavior when witnessing signs of impending sexual assault.
  • To assess the effectiveness of a deception-based methodology in eliciting natural bystander responses.
  • To explore participant reactions and the impact of a funnelling debrief on their experiences.

Main Methods:

  • Development and evaluation of a novel methodology using deception to study bystander intervention.
  • Recruitment of 13 participants who were unaware of the study's true objective.
  • Collection of observational data on participant reactions to simulated sexual assault cues, followed by a funnelling debrief.

Main Results:

  • Participant reactions to sexual assault cues varied, ranging from non-intervention to direct or indirect intervention.
  • The deception methodology was effective, with participants remaining unaware of the study's aim until debriefing.
  • The funnelling debrief successfully mitigated potential adverse effects of deception, enhancing participants' confidence and motivation to intervene.

Conclusions:

  • The developed methodology effectively measures actual bystander behavior in simulated sexual assault situations.
  • Observational data and a structured debriefing process are valuable for studying bystander intervention.
  • This approach can inform the creation of more effective bystander intervention programs to combat sexual violence.