Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Surgical Swine Model of Chronic Cardiac Ischemia Treated by Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Published on: March 27, 2018
Optimizing Revascularization in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: Comparative Evidence on the Benefits and Indications of CABG
Dan M Prunea1, Calin Homorodean1,2, Maria Olinic1,2
1Medical Clinic No. 1, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Insights
Coronary revascularization for ischemic cardiomyopathy is complex. Coronary artery bypass grafting improves survival, while percutaneous coronary intervention enhances quality of life, guiding individualized treatment decisions.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Ischemic cardiomyopathy is a primary cause of heart failure.
- Optimal revascularization strategies for patients with reduced left ventricular function remain unclear.
- Evidence synthesis is needed for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Purpose of the Study:
- To review current evidence on coronary revascularization strategies for ischemic cardiomyopathy.
- To evaluate the benefits and limitations of CABG and PCI.
- To propose an algorithm for guiding revascularization decisions.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of current evidence.
- Critical evaluation of STICH and REVIVED-BCIS2 trial findings.
- Emphasis on advanced imaging and risk stratification.
Main Results:
- CABG improves long-term survival, especially in extensive multivessel disease (STICH trial).
- PCI enhances quality of life but shows no significant mortality benefit over optimal medical therapy (REVIVED-BCIS2 trial).
- PCI offers symptom relief for high-risk patients unsuitable for CABG.
Conclusions:
- Revascularization decisions require individualized assessment, considering patient-specific factors and treatment goals.
- Advanced imaging and risk stratification are crucial for optimizing outcomes.
- A multidisciplinary Heart Team approach is essential for tailoring revascularization strategies.
Abstract:
Ischemic cardiomyopathy remains a leading cause of heart failure, yet the optimal revascularization approach for patients with reduced left ventricular function remains uncertain. This review synthesizes current evidence on coronary revascularization strategies, emphasizing real-world applicability and individualized treatment. It critically evaluates the benefits and limitations of coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG] and percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI], highlighting key knowledge gaps. Findings from the STICH trial demonstrate that CABG improves long-term survival despite an elevated early procedural risk, particularly in patients with extensive multivessel disease. In contrast, the REVIVED-BCIS2 trial suggests that PCI enhances quality of life but does not significantly reduce mortality compared to optimal medical therapy, making it a viable alternative for high-risk patients ineligible for surgery. This review underscores the role of advanced imaging techniques in myocardial viability assessment and emphasizes the importance of comprehensive risk stratification in guiding revascularization decisions. Special attention is given to managing high-risk patients unsuitable for CABG and the potential benefits of PCI in symptom relief despite uncertain survival benefits. A stepwise algorithm is proposed to assist clinicians in tailoring revascularization strategies, reinforcing the need for a multidisciplinary Heart Team approach to optimize outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care

