Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2026

A Multicenter MRI Protocol for the Evaluation and Quantification of Deep Vein Thrombosis
Published on: June 2, 2015
Intraventricular Thrombosis After Myocardial Infarction: Prognostic Evaluation in Relation to Microvascular
Antonella Cecchetto1,2, Francesco Zupa2, Manuel De Lazzari1,2
1Cardiology Unit, University of Padua-Azienda Ospedaliera, 35128 Padua, Italy.
Insights
Patients with left ventricular thrombosis after myocardial infarction treated with anticoagulation have a worse prognosis. Microvascular obstruction extent did not worsen outcomes in these patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Imaging
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Limited data exists on anticoagulation therapy for left ventricular thrombosis (LV thrombosis) post-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
- Assessing the impact of microvascular obstruction (MVO) on prognosis in STEMI patients with LV thrombosis is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the prognostic impact of MVO extent on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in STEMI patients with LV thrombosis receiving anticoagulation.
- To determine if MVO exacerbates the adverse outcomes associated with LV thrombosis.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 80 STEMI patients undergoing CMR after reperfusion therapy.
- Patients categorized into four groups based on MVO and LV thrombosis presence.
- Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) tracked during an 11-month follow-up period.
Main Results:
- LV thrombosis, treated with anticoagulation, independently predicted MACE (HR 2.828, p=0.017).
- Patients with LV thrombosis showed a significantly worse prognosis (p=0.012) compared to those without.
- The extent of MVO did not significantly influence prognosis in patients with LV thrombosis (p=0.852).
Conclusions:
- Anticoagulation therapy for LV thrombosis post-STEMI is associated with a poorer prognosis.
- MVO extent does not appear to be an additional risk factor for adverse outcomes in this patient cohort.
Abstract:
(1) Background: There are few data on anticoagulation therapy for left ventricular (LV) thrombosis following ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The aim of this study was to assess whether microvascular obstruction (MVO) extent on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) worsened the prognosis of patients with LV thrombosis receiving anticoagulation. (2) Methods: reperfused STEMI patients undergoing CMR were enrolled. Patients were divided into 4 groups according to MVO and LV thrombosis presence or absence. Occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) was evaluated during follow-up. (3) Results: 80 STEMI patients were enrolled. According to MVO and LV thrombosis, 4 subgroups were obtained: patients with MVO and LV thrombosis (21 patients, 26%); patients with MVO without LV thrombosis (28 patients, 35%); patients without MVO with LV thrombosis (6 patients, 8%); patients without MVO and LV thrombosis (25 patients, 31%). All patients with LV thrombosis were treated with anticoagulation therapy. The median time to the follow-up was 11 months. Twenty-two patients (27%) experienced MACE. LV thrombosis treated with anticoagulation was an independent predictor of MACE (hazard ratio, 2.828; 95% confidence interval, 1.205-6.638; p = 0.017) and was associated with a worse prognosis (p = 0.012), regardless of MVO (p = 0.852), at Kaplan-Meier. (4) Conclusions: Patients with LV thrombosis treated with anticoagulation after a reperfused STEMI have a worse prognosis than those without; however, MVO extent did not worsen prognosis.
More Related Videos
08:13In Vivo Quantitative Assessment of Myocardial Structure, Function, Perfusion and Viability Using Cardiac Micro-computed Tomography
Published on: February 16, 2016
06:29Cardiac Magnetic Resonance for the Evaluation of Suspected Cardiac Thrombus: Conventional and Emerging Techniques
Published on: June 11, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies