Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2026

08:04
Proximal Cadaveric Femur Preparation for Fracture Strength Testing and Quantitative CT-based Finite Element Analysis
Published on: March 11, 2017
9.2K
Proximal Hip Fracture: Does Canal Width Matter?
Maria Oulianski1, Amit Sagi2, Philip Rosinsky2
1Orthopedic Department, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot 7639302, Israel.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
|April 26, 2025
Summary
Proximal femur fractures in older adults are linked to bone quality. Higher calcar-to-canal ratio (CCR) on pelvic radiographs predicts trochanteric fractures, unlike cortical thickness index (CTI) or Dorr classification.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedics
- Radiology
- Geriatrics
Background:
- Proximal femur fractures are prevalent in the elderly population.
- Bone quality significantly influences fracture risk.
- Radiographic parameters may predict fracture types.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate bone morphology parameters from pelvic anteroposterior (AP) radiographs.
- To determine predictive value of calcar-to-canal ratio (CCR), cortical thickness index (CTI), and Dorr classification for trochanteric versus sub-capital femur fractures.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 237 medical records of patients with proximal femur fractures.
- Radiological assessment of CCR, CTI, and Dorr classification by two independent observers.
- Statistical evaluation including logistic regression and inter-rater reliability (ICC, Cronbach's alpha).
Main Results:
- 202 patients were included; mean age 81.41 years.
- Trochanteric fracture group was significantly older (p=0.005).
- Calcar-to-canal ratio (CCR) was a significant predictor (p=0.001), while CTI (p=0.78) and Dorr classification (p=0.98) were not.
- Logistic regression predicted 60.4% of fractures based on CCR.
Conclusions:
- Calcar-to-canal ratio (CCR) is a significant radiographic predictor for trochanteric femur fractures.
- Higher CCR values are associated with an increased likelihood of trochanteric fractures.
- CTI and Dorr classification showed no significant predictive value in this cohort.

