Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II01:19

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II

278
In gas chromatography, different detectors are employed to meet specific analytical needs. These detectors are often categorized based on their detection mechanisms and the types of compounds they are best suited to analyze. Thermal Conductivity Detectors (TCD), Flame Ionization Detectors (FID), and Electron Capture Detectors (ECD) represent common categories, each with unique operating principles and applications. However, beyond these, several other detectors are designed for more specialized...
278
Gas Chromatography: Overview of Detectors01:13

Gas Chromatography: Overview of Detectors

301
Detectors in gas chromatography (GC) help identify and quantify the components of a mixture by translating chemical properties into measurable signals, which are displayed on a chromatogram. Detectors can be categorized into two main types: destructive and non-destructive.
A non-destructive detector allows a sample to be analyzed without altering or consuming it, meaning the sample can be collected after detection for further analysis. Examples include thermal conductivity detectors and...
301
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-I01:21

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-I

291
There are different types of detectors used in gas chromatography, each with its own specific properties that make it suitable for detecting certain types of analytes. The most commonly used detectors in GC are thermal conductivity detector (TCD), flame ionization detector (FID), and electron capture detector (ECD).
TCD is the earliest and most widely used detector that operates by measuring the changes in the thermal conductivity of the carrier gas. When a sample compound enters the detector,...
291
High-Performance Liquid Chromatography: Types of Detectors01:15

High-Performance Liquid Chromatography: Types of Detectors

360
The role of the detectors in High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) is to analyze the solutes as they exit from the chromatographic column. The detector recognizes the solute's property and generates corresponding electrical signals, which are converted into a readable graph of the detector's response versus elution time called a chromatogram at the computer. There are several types of HPLC detectors, each with its own advantages and limitations, depending on the analyte...
360

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Bjøntegaard Bible Why Your Way of Comparing Video Codecs May Be Wrong.

IEEE transactions on image processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society·2024
Same author

Modeling and Fault Detection of Brushless Direct Current Motor by Deep Learning Sensor Data Fusion.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2022
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 10, 2025

Additive Manufacturing-Enabled Low-Cost Particle Detector
06:05

Additive Manufacturing-Enabled Low-Cost Particle Detector

Published on: March 24, 2023

1.1K

Optimizing Sensor Placement for Event Detection: A Case Study in Gaseous Chemical Detection.

Priscile Fogou Suawa1, Christian Herglotz1

  • 1Department of Computer Engineering, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, 03046 Cottbus, Germany.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|April 26, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Optimizing sensor placement improves industrial monitoring. This study used deep learning and genetic algorithms for chemical detection, achieving 100% accuracy with fewer sensors.

Keywords:
event detectiongaseous substancesindustrial monitoring applicationsinfluence of sensor locationmulti-objective optimizationsensorssensors fusionsupervised learning

More Related Videos

Infrared Degenerate Four-wave Mixing with Upconversion Detection for Quantitative Gas Sensing
10:42

Infrared Degenerate Four-wave Mixing with Upconversion Detection for Quantitative Gas Sensing

Published on: March 22, 2019

6.1K
Quantitative Detection of Trace Explosive Vapors by Programmed Temperature Desorption Gas Chromatography-Electron Capture Detector
07:57

Quantitative Detection of Trace Explosive Vapors by Programmed Temperature Desorption Gas Chromatography-Electron Capture Detector

Published on: July 25, 2014

19.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 10, 2025

Additive Manufacturing-Enabled Low-Cost Particle Detector
06:05

Additive Manufacturing-Enabled Low-Cost Particle Detector

Published on: March 24, 2023

1.1K
Infrared Degenerate Four-wave Mixing with Upconversion Detection for Quantitative Gas Sensing
10:42

Infrared Degenerate Four-wave Mixing with Upconversion Detection for Quantitative Gas Sensing

Published on: March 22, 2019

6.1K
Quantitative Detection of Trace Explosive Vapors by Programmed Temperature Desorption Gas Chromatography-Electron Capture Detector
07:57

Quantitative Detection of Trace Explosive Vapors by Programmed Temperature Desorption Gas Chromatography-Electron Capture Detector

Published on: July 25, 2014

19.6K

Area of Science:

  • Industrial IoT and Sensor Networks
  • Chemical Detection and Monitoring
  • Machine Learning for Event Detection

Background:

  • Strategic sensor placement is crucial for industrial monitoring and event detection in Industry 4.0 environments.
  • Optimal sensor placement research is limited, especially for challenges like gas dispersion in chemical detection.
  • Existing methods often lack a balance between detection accuracy and deployment cost.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the impact of sensor placement on event detection accuracy in industrial settings.
  • To develop and test effective algorithms for chemical gas detection using optimized sensor configurations.
  • To identify sensor placements that maximize detection accuracy while minimizing deployment costs.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs) and decision tree (DT) models for event detection.
  • Implemented a non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II) for multi-objective optimization of sensor placement.
  • Tested detection models on a public dataset of chemical substances collected across five locations.

Main Results:

  • The DCNN model achieved 100% accuracy in detecting chemical substances.
  • Optimal sensor placement was identified using NSGA-II, balancing accuracy and cost.
  • High detection accuracy was achieved using only 30% of the available sensors with refined placement.

Conclusions:

  • Strategic sensor placement significantly enhances industrial monitoring and event detection capabilities.
  • Combining advanced algorithms like DCNNs with optimization techniques like NSGA-II offers a powerful approach to sensor network design.
  • Cost-effective and highly accurate chemical detection systems are achievable through optimized sensor deployment.