Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Quality Control01:05

Quality Control

131
Quality control is one of the three cyclical quality assurance activities that help keep a system under statistical control. Typical quality control activities include creating quality control charts, conducting proficiency testing, and documenting and archiving results.
Quality control helps track data, visualize trends, and identify variations, making it easier to detect deviations that may affect the accuracy of an analysis. One way to do this is by generating a quality control chart, which...
131
Interpreting X̄ Charts01:13

Interpreting X̄ Charts

37
Interpreting x̄ charts, a type of control chart used in statistical process control helps monitor the variation in processes over time. The x̄ chart is based on the sample mean and allows for monitoring variations in the process mean over time. These charts are pivotal for quality assurance in manufacturing and other sectors.
An x̄ chart plots the values of individual measurements over time against control limits calculated from historical data. The central line...
37

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cytisine for Smoking Cessation Within a Lung Cancer Screening Program: Results From the Italian RISP Trial.

Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer·2026
Same author

Budget Impact Analysis of Vacuum-Assisted Excision Versus Surgical Excision for the Assessment of Breast Lesions of Uncertain Malignant Potential in Italy.

PharmacoEconomics - open·2026
Same author

Preoperative Breast MRI in Surgical Decision-Making for Breast Cancer: Clinical Value Beyond Sensitivity.

Cancers·2026
Same author

Artificial intelligence for risk-stratified breast cancer screening: a systematic review of evidence, clinical integration, and ethical implications in risk assessment tools.

La Radiologia medica·2026
Same author

Clinical Performance of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Versus Breast MRI in Women at Increased Breast Cancer Risk.

Cancers·2026
Same author

Imaging Ductal Carcinoma In Situ in the Era of De-Escalation: Role, Limits, and Clinical Implications for Risk-Adapted Management.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 10, 2025

Author Spotlight: Using Hyperpolarized Xenon-129 MRI to Study Lung Diseases
09:55

Author Spotlight: Using Hyperpolarized Xenon-129 MRI to Study Lung Diseases

Published on: January 5, 2024

1.1K

Inter-phantom variability in digital mammography: implications for quality control.

Gisella Gennaro1, Gilberto Contento2, Andrea Ballaminut2

  • 1Veneto Institute of Oncology (IOV), IRCCS, Padua, Italy. gisella.gennaro@iov.veneto.it.

European Radiology Experimental
|April 26, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Inter-phantom variability significantly impacts mammography image quality metrics, with phantom-to-phantom differences being more influential than within-phantom variations. Using a single phantom is crucial for reliable inter-system comparisons in mammography quality control.

Keywords:
Data accuracyMammographyPhantoms (imaging)Quality controlReproducibility of results

More Related Videos

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
13:44

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

Published on: August 30, 2013

42.6K
Measuring the Complete-arch Distortion of an Optical Dental Impression
06:51

Measuring the Complete-arch Distortion of an Optical Dental Impression

Published on: May 30, 2019

7.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 10, 2025

Author Spotlight: Using Hyperpolarized Xenon-129 MRI to Study Lung Diseases
09:55

Author Spotlight: Using Hyperpolarized Xenon-129 MRI to Study Lung Diseases

Published on: January 5, 2024

1.1K
Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
13:44

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

Published on: August 30, 2013

42.6K
Measuring the Complete-arch Distortion of an Optical Dental Impression
06:51

Measuring the Complete-arch Distortion of an Optical Dental Impression

Published on: May 30, 2019

7.4K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging Physics
  • Radiological Quality Assurance
  • Mammography Technology

Background:

  • Phantoms are essential for mammography quality control (QC), standardizing image quality (IQ) metric evaluation.
  • Inter-phantom variability can compromise the reliability of IQ metrics, particularly in inter-system comparisons.
  • Quantifying phantom variability is crucial for accurate mammography system assessments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify the intra- and inter-phantom variability of various image quality metrics in digital mammography.
  • To determine the relative contributions of intra- and inter-phantom variability to overall measurement uncertainty.
  • To provide recommendations for optimizing mammography quality control protocols.

Main Methods:

  • Twenty-four TORMAS phantoms were imaged ten times each under standardized high-dose mammography conditions.
  • Automated software extracted 64 IQ metrics, including contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), modulation transfer function (MTF), and contrast metrics.
  • Variability was assessed using variances and coefficients of variation (COVs), with outlier exclusion.

Main Results:

  • Inter-phantom variability was consistently higher than intra-phantom variability across all evaluated IQ metrics.
  • Mean inter-phantom COVs were 15.1% for CNR, 5.4% for MTF, 0.75% for contrast, and 14.8% for noise metrics.
  • Inter-phantom variability accounted for 84.2% of the total variability, demonstrating its dominant influence.

Conclusions:

  • Inter-phantom variability significantly impacts mammography IQ metrics, necessitating the use of a single phantom for inter-system comparisons.
  • Phantoms are suitable for assessing system reproducibility over time when a consistent phantom is employed.
  • Findings emphasize the need for careful consideration of phantom variability in QC protocols for reliable imaging system benchmarking.