Prognostic implications of resection margin status in distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
- Go-Won Choi 1, Won-Gun Yun 1, Mirang Lee 1, Hye-Sol Jung 1, Young J Cho 1, Youngmin Han 1, Wooil Kwon 1, Jin-Young Jang 1
- Go-Won Choi 1, Won-Gun Yun 1, Mirang Lee 1
- 1Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
- 0Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
|
April 26, 2025
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.For distal pancreatectomy, a tumor-free margin of 0 mm (R1) is a significant predictor of shorter survival. Achieving a microscopically negative posterior margin is crucial for improving patient outcomes in pancreatic cancer surgery.
Area Of Science
- Surgical Oncology
- Gastroenterology
- Pathology
Background
- Curative resection is a key prognostic factor in pancreatectomy.
- The definition and clinical significance of resection margins in distal pancreatectomy are debated.
Purpose Of The Study
- To evaluate the prognostic impact of different resection margin definitions (0 mm vs. 1 mm) in distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer.
- To identify specific margins that influence survival outcomes.
Main Methods
- Analysis of 203 patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer (2010-2018).
- Classification into R0-wide (≥1 mm tumor-free margin), R0-narrow (0 < margin < 1 mm), and R1 (0 mm margin) groups.
- Evaluation of individual margins: transection, anterior, and posterior.
Main Results
- R1 margins were significantly associated with shorter overall survival (HR 2.02, p=0.001) compared to R0-wide margins.
- Posterior margin involvement was identified as an independent poor prognostic factor (HR 1.83, p=0.027).
- R0-narrow margins did not show a significant difference in overall survival compared to R0-wide margins (HR 1.17, p=0.446).
Conclusions
- The 0 mm rule for resection margins appears more suitable for predicting prognosis in distal pancreatectomy than the 1 mm rule.
- Achieving a microscopically negative posterior margin is critical for improving survival in patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.

