Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Perceived Usability, User Experience, and Technology Acceptance of Role-Specific Augmented Reality Decision Support Tools for Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation: Prospective Observational Pilot Study.

JMIR XR and spatial computing·2026
Same author

Augmented Reality-Guided Decision Support in Simulated Pediatric Cardiac Arrest: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA network open·2026
Same author

Impact of an augmented reality-based decision support system on teamwork, leadership, provider workload and cognitive load during simulated cardiac arrest - a simulation-based randomized controlled trial.

Advances in simulation (London, England)·2026
Same author

Evaluating a Shared Decision Support Tool for Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Arrest: Mixed Methods Usability Study.

JMIR human factors·2026
Same author

Streamlined Facial Data Collection Based on Utterance and Emotional Data for Human-to-Avatar Reconstruction.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2026
Same author

Influence of Avatar Appearance and Target Distance on Locomotion Method Selection in Virtual Reality.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2026
Same journal

Learning Moisture-Induced Damage From Vision: Diffusion Models for Real-Time Monitoring of Additive Manufacturing Processes.

Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)·2026
Same journal

Intrinsic Dual-Phase Regulated GeSe<sub>2</sub> Nanoparticles Triggered by Ball-Milling Treatment for Photonic Multi-Valued Logic Circuits.

Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)·2026
Same journal

A Plant Photoregulator-Inspired S-Type Heterojunction System for Diabetic Keratopathy via Tri-Modal Light-Driven Immunometabolic Reprogramming, Tissue Repair, and Antibacterial Activity.

Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)·2026
Same journal

eEF1G Orchestrates Translation to Ensure Meiotic Progression in Transcriptionally Quiescent Spermatocytes.

Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)·2026
Same journal

Ultrasound-Recharged Sub-Nanometer Palladium Catalysts for on-Demand and Self-Terminating Bioorthogonal Prodrug Activation in Cancer Therapy.

Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)·2026
Same journal

Graphene Aerogels With Spherical Pore Structure for Broad Frequency Regulation and Enhanced Low-Frequency Response.

Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 10, 2025

Automated Robotic Dispensing Technique for Surface Guidance and Bioprinting of Cells
10:14

Automated Robotic Dispensing Technique for Surface Guidance and Bioprinting of Cells

Published on: November 18, 2016

6.4K

Machine Learning-Enhanced Optimization for High-Throughput Precision in Cellular Droplet Bioprinting.

Jaemyung Shin1, Ryan Kang2, Kinam Hyun3

  • 1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1N4, Canada.

Advanced Science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)
|April 27, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Machine learning optimizes 3D bioprinting parameters for consistent organoid production, overcoming manual methods

Keywords:
bioprintingcellular dropletsmachine learningoptimization

More Related Videos

Viability of Bioprinted Cellular Constructs Using a Three Dispenser Cartesian Printer
07:05

Viability of Bioprinted Cellular Constructs Using a Three Dispenser Cartesian Printer

Published on: September 22, 2015

10.0K
Counting Proteins in Single Cells with Addressable Droplet Microarrays
12:25

Counting Proteins in Single Cells with Addressable Droplet Microarrays

Published on: July 6, 2018

8.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 10, 2025

Automated Robotic Dispensing Technique for Surface Guidance and Bioprinting of Cells
10:14

Automated Robotic Dispensing Technique for Surface Guidance and Bioprinting of Cells

Published on: November 18, 2016

6.4K
Viability of Bioprinted Cellular Constructs Using a Three Dispenser Cartesian Printer
07:05

Viability of Bioprinted Cellular Constructs Using a Three Dispenser Cartesian Printer

Published on: September 22, 2015

10.0K
Counting Proteins in Single Cells with Addressable Droplet Microarrays
12:25

Counting Proteins in Single Cells with Addressable Droplet Microarrays

Published on: July 6, 2018

8.4K

Area of Science:

  • Biotechnology and Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Traditional organoid production methods using manual pipetting are labor-intensive and prone to batch-to-batch variability.
  • 3D bioprinting offers a more efficient alternative for consistent organoid production, but parameter optimization is challenging.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To employ machine learning to optimize critical 3D bioprinting parameters for organoid production.
  • To develop algorithms for immediate prediction of cellular droplet size based on printing parameters.

Main Methods:

  • Designed a high-throughput cellular droplet bioprinter capable of printing over 50 droplets simultaneously.
  • Utilized machine learning to optimize five parameters: bioink viscosity, nozzle size, printing time, printing pressure, and cell concentration.
  • Evaluated five machine learning algorithms, including multilayer perceptron and decision tree models.

Main Results:

  • The multilayer perceptron model achieved the highest prediction accuracy for cellular droplet size.
  • The decision tree model provided the fastest computation time among the evaluated algorithms.
  • Developed a user-friendly interface integrating the optimized machine learning models.

Conclusions:

  • Machine learning effectively optimizes 3D bioprinting parameters for reproducible organoid production.
  • The developed platform streamlines organoid generation, enabling scalable production for diverse applications.
  • This approach is expected to synergize with various bioprinting technologies.