Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 15, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancing Early Detection and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors
Published on: February 16, 2024
Development of an electronic patient safety surveillance model to efficiently identify potential adverse events for
Brian A Sullivan1, Marva V Foster2, Andrew Hwang3
1Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Cooperative Studies Program Epidemiology Center-Durham, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Background And Aims:
Tracking of adverse events (AEs) after GI endoscopy is endorsed by guideline committees yet remains challenging in practice. Our aim was to develop and validate an electronic surveillance model to systematically identify outpatient endoscopies with a likely AE.
Methods:
We evaluated outpatient GI procedures across the Veterans Health Administration. We defined endoscopy-related AEs and reviewed a sample of charts with and without electronic trigger flags (eg, emergency department visit) for possible AEs from 2018 to 2020 to develop a surveillance model using relevant patient, procedure, and facility factors. The model's optimal threshold for flagging potential AEs was determined to maximize performance characteristics. A second independent chart review was conducted from 2021 to 2022 to validate the model at this threshold.
Results:
We reviewed the chart of 1085 cases (317 AEs) of 484,520 outpatient GI procedures for model development and 297 cases (167 AEs) of 20,849 procedures for model validation. At the optimal "AE flag" threshold, the model flagged 1.2% of all GI endoscopies with a potential AE. In the validation sample, the positive predictive value and false-negative rate were 69.6% and 26.0%, respectively.
Conclusions:
This electronic AE surveillance model can efficiently identify outpatient GI endoscopy cases with a high likelihood of patient harm to complement existing strategies for AE monitoring. Additionally, this methodology demonstrates flexibility to either maximize AE identification or minimize chart review burden by changing the "AE flag" threshold. Such tools should enhance quality improvement opportunities, patient safety, and understanding of AEs in routine GI endoscopy.
More Related Videos
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
07:31Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Endoscopic Procedures I: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
During an EGD, the endoscope can be used to:
Endoscopic Procedures III: Video Capsule Endoscopy
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System I: Subjective Data
Health History
The initial step in assessing the GI system is obtaining a comprehensive health history. This includes inquiring about the patient's history or presence of problems...
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System II: Health Perception Pattern
Health Perception Patterns
Health perception patterns offer valuable insights into a patient's lifestyle habits and how they may impact their GI health. These patterns include:
Endoscopic Procedures V: ERCP
Patient...