Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2025

Operant Conditioning Task to Measure Song Preference in Zebra Finches
Published on: December 26, 2019
Neuropeptides and reproductive flexibility in songbirds: A mini review
Vatsala Tripathi1,2, Sanjay Kumar Bhardwaj2, Vinod Kumar3
1Department of Zoology, Dyal Singh College, University of Delhi, Delhi, India.
Abstract:
Synchronization of physiological and behavioral activities associated with avian reproduction requires corresponding changes in the activity of the hypothalamus-pituitary-gonadal axis. This involves complex brain peptidergic pathways, which show spatial and temporal differences in their expression and distribution during the annual reproductive cycle. The well-studied pathways include gonadotropin-releasing and inhibiting hormones (GnRH, GnIH), neuropeptide Y (NPY), cocaine- and amphetamine-regulated transcript (CART), vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and other peptides like arginine vasotocin (VT), oxytocin (mesotocin), and spexin. Together, these peptides form a neurochemical framework for the integration of both internal and external (environmental) cues; this results in a neuroendocrine response. Conceivably, therefore, the neurochemical framework within which brain peptides possibly interact and perform reproductive regulatory roles might show species differences. Here, we aim to review briefly the roles of these neuropeptides in reproduction in both opportunistically and seasonally breeding birds. Much of the discussion will be based on our own research on the opportunistic breeding zebra finch and the seasonally breeding redheaded bunting, Indian weaverbird, and spotted munia. The summer breeding redheaded bunting and weaverbird are typical photosensitive long-day species, but they show qualitative differences in response to stimulatory photoperiods during the post-reproductive period of their annual cycle. Buntings exhibit absolute photorefractoriness, while weaverbirds exhibit relative photorefractoriness. The autumn breeding spotted munia, on the other hand, is an atypical photosensitive species. It responds to both short and long photoperiods and presumably lacks photorefractoriness.
Related Concept Videos
Cis-regulatory Sequences
Mate Choice
Background and Environment Affect Phenotype
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...

