Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2025

Experimental Methods to Study Human Postural Control
Published on: September 11, 2019
Response estimation and system identification of dynamical systems via physics-informed neural networks
Marcus Haywood-Alexander1, Giacomo Arcieri1, Antonios Kamariotis1
1Department of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering, ETH Zürich, Wolfgang-Pauli Strasse, 8049 Zürich, Switzerland.
Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) efficiently identify dynamical systems, even with modeling errors. PINNs offer a robust approach for state and parameter estimation in structural dynamics, enhancing structural health monitoring and design.
Area of Science:
- Engineering
- Computational Science
- Machine Learning
Background:
- Accurate modeling of structural dynamics is vital for engineering applications like Structural Health Monitoring (SHM).
- Physics-based models often struggle with nonlinearities and uncertainties, especially with sparse sensor data.
- Existing methods face challenges in precise system identification and parameter estimation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore the application of Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) for identifying and estimating dynamical systems.
- To investigate PINNs for state estimation with sparse sensing and joint state-parameter estimation.
- To evaluate PINNs for parameter estimation from full-field data within a Bayesian framework.
Main Methods:
- Utilizing Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs), a physics-enhanced machine learning (PEML) technique.
- Embedding physical laws directly into the neural network's loss function.
- Applying PINNs to state estimation, joint state-parameter estimation, and parameter estimation with uncertainty quantification.
Main Results:
- PINNs demonstrated efficiency across all investigated tasks, including systems with modeling errors.
- PINNs effectively handle complex phenomena and uncertainties in dynamical system modeling.
- Parameter estimation proved more sensitive to modeling errors compared to state estimation.
Conclusions:
- PINNs offer a promising and robust tool for dynamical system modeling and identification.
- The integration of physical laws enhances machine learning models' ability to handle real-world engineering challenges.
- PINNs provide a valuable approach for improving accuracy and reliability in structural dynamics applications.
More Related Videos
06:45Design and Application of a Fault Detection Method Based on Adaptive Filters and Rotational Speed Estimation for an Electro-Hydrostatic Actuator
Published on: October 28, 2022
08:08Real-time Electrophysiology: Using Closed-loop Protocols to Probe Neuronal Dynamics and Beyond
Published on: June 24, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Linear Approximation in Time Domain
For a simple pendulum with a mass evenly distributed along its length and the center of mass located at half the pendulum's length,...
Linear Approximation in Frequency Domain
In contrast, nonlinear systems do not inherently possess these properties. However, for small deviations around an operating point, a nonlinear system can often be approximated as linear....
Second Order systems II
Feedback control systems
Linear feedback systems are theoretical models that simplify analysis and design. These systems operate under the principle that their output is directly proportional to their input within certain ranges. For instance, an amplifier in a control system behaves linearly as long as the input signal remains within a specific range. However, most physical systems exhibit inherent nonlinearity...
Classification of Systems-I
Homogeneity dictates that if an input x(t) is multiplied by a constant c, the output y(t) is multiplied by the same constant. Mathematically, this is expressed as:
Mechanical Systems