Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2025

12:57
Genome-wide Quantification of Translation in Budding Yeast by Ribosome Profiling
Published on: December 21, 2017
11.4K
Macroevolutionary changes in natural selection on codon usage reflects evolution of the tRNA pool across a budding
Biorxiv : the Preprint Server for Biology
|April 28, 2025
Summary
Codon usage bias (CUB) varies across species due to changes in natural selection and mutation biases. Evolution of the tRNA pool, influenced by tRNA gene copy number and modifications, impacts CUB and translation efficiency.
Area of Science:
- Microbiology
- Evolutionary Biology
- Genetics
Background:
- Synonymous codons are used unequally within genes, a phenomenon known as codon usage bias (CUB).
- CUB varies across species and reflects a balance of microevolutionary forces like natural selection and mutation bias.
- CUB is closely linked to molecular processes, especially mRNA translation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify natural selection and mutation biases on a per-codon basis across budding yeasts.
- To investigate how microevolutionary processes and molecular mechanisms interact to shape CUB variation.
- To understand the link between tRNA evolution and natural selection in codon usage.
Main Methods:
- Employed a population genetics model to analyze codon usage bias.
- Quantified per-codon natural selection and mutation biases across 327 budding yeast species.
- Correlated CUB variations with tRNA gene copy number and genome-wide GC content.
Main Results:
- Significant variation in natural selection and mutation biases was observed even between closely related yeasts.
- Changes in natural selection on CUB were linked to the evolution of tRNA gene copy number.
- Evidence suggests tRNA modification expression influences natural selection on CUB independently of tRNA gene copy number.
- Changes in tRNA gene copy number often correlated with genome-wide GC content, indicating a link to mutation bias.
Conclusions:
- The evolution of the tRNA pool, including gene copy number and modifications, is a key driver of natural selection in codon usage.
- Changes in microevolutionary processes, such as mutation bias, can influence the tRNA pool and subsequently affect CUB.
- This study elucidates how molecular mechanisms and microevolutionary dynamics interact to shape macroevolutionary variation in traits like codon usage bias.
Related Concept Videos
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?
7.0K
The genomes of eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of sequence which do not code for proteins or RNAs. Although some of these regions do contain crucial regulatory sequences, the vast majority of this DNA serves no known function. Typically, these regions of the genome are the ones in which the fastest change, in evolutionary terms, is observed, because there is typically little to no selection pressure acting on these regions to preserve their sequences.
In contrast, regions which code...
In contrast, regions which code...
7.0K
Bacterial Transcription
27.7K
RNA polymerase (RNAP) carries out DNA-dependent RNA synthesis in both bacteria and eukaryotes. Bacteria do not have a membrane-bound nucleus. So, transcription and translation occur simultaneously, on the same DNA template.
Transcription can be divided into three main stages, each involving distinct DNA sequences to guide the polymerase. These are:
Transcription can be divided into three main stages, each involving distinct DNA sequences to guide the polymerase. These are:
27.7K
Bacterial RNA Polymerase
27.9K
Unlike eukaryotes, bacteria use a single RNA Polymerase (RNAP) to transcribe all genes. The different subunits of bacterial RNAPhave distinct functions. The multisubunit structure of the bacterial RNAP helps the enzyme to maintain catalytic function, facilitate assembly, interact with DNA and RNA, and self-regulate its activity.
In most genes, the transcription site is a single base present upstream of the coding sequence. Though RNAP is a catalytically efficient enzyme, it does not recognize...
In most genes, the transcription site is a single base present upstream of the coding sequence. Though RNAP is a catalytically efficient enzyme, it does not recognize...
27.9K
Genome Size and the Evolution of New Genes
7.8K
While every living organism has a genome of some kind (be it RNA, or DNA), there is considerable variation in the sizes of these blueprints. One major factor that impacts genome size is whether the organism is prokaryotic or eukaryotic. In prokaryotes, the genome contains little to no non-coding sequence, such that genes are tightly clustered in groups or operons sequentially along the chromosome. Conversely, the genes in eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of non-coding sequence.
7.8K
Eukaryotic Evolution
29.5K
The endosymbiont theory is the most widely accepted theory of eukaryotic evolution; however, its progression is still somewhat debated. According to the nucleus-first hypothesis, the ancestral prokaryote first evolved a membrane to enclose DNA and form the nucleus. Conversely, the mitochondria-first hypothesis suggests that the nucleus was formed after endosymbiosis of mitochondria.
Contrary to the endosymbiont theory, the eukaryote-first hypothesis proposes that the simpler prokaryotic and...
Contrary to the endosymbiont theory, the eukaryote-first hypothesis proposes that the simpler prokaryotic and...
29.5K
Gene Duplication and Divergence
6.0K
The seminal work of Ohno in 1970 popularized the idea of gene duplication and divergence. DNA sequence comparison studies reveal that a large portion of the genes in bacteria, archaebacteria, and eukaryotes was generated by gene duplication and divergence, indicating its critical role in evolution.
The duplicated copies of the gene are called Paralogs. Paralogs with similar sequences and functions form a gene family. Across several species, a large number of gene families are...
The duplicated copies of the gene are called Paralogs. Paralogs with similar sequences and functions form a gene family. Across several species, a large number of gene families are...
6.0K

