Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2025

Rapid and Low-cost Prototyping of Medical Devices Using 3D Printed Molds for Liquid Injection Molding
Published on: June 27, 2014
Bridging the gap: a paradigm shift in medical device regulations in India
Diksha Pundir1, Sukhpreet Kaur2, Rajinder Kaur3
1Department of Laws, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India.
None:
India is among the top 20 international markets for medical devices. With increasing economic growth, rising life expectancy, and rapid technological advancements, the healthcare needs of the population have surged. This is particularly evident with the rise in chronic diseases, growing healthcare awareness, and the growing demand for personalized care and treatment. Medical devices, which encompass a wide range of machines, instruments, apparatus, and even software, play a vital role in diagnosing, treating, preventing, monitoring, and providing palliative care for various health conditions. Examples include X-ray machines, pacemakers, hip implants, ultrasound machines, glucose metres, prosthetics, and defibrillators. These devices are indispensable in the healthcare continuum across India. However, the development of India's medical device industry faces significant challenges, including limited infrastructure, outdated regulatory frameworks, and an inability to support sustainable growth. The Johnson & Johnson hip implant scandal highlighted the gaps in the existing regulatory system. The current Drugs and Cosmetics Act of 1940 (DCA, 1940) is inadequate in defining medical devices, regulating their import and manufacture, ensuring patient safety, managing adverse event reporting, and holding medical device companies accountable. To address these issues, the Medical Device Rules was introduced by the Government of India in 2017 (MDR, 2017). However, there has been a long-standing need for a more comprehensive legislative framework specifically for medical devices. To this end, the new Drugs, Medical Devices, and Cosmetics Bill of 2022 was proposed to substitute the outdated 1940 Act. This doctrinal research critically examines the shortcomings of the current DCA,1940 vis-à-vis the case study of Johnson & Johnson hip implant issue and provides a comparative analysis of this Act with the newly proposed Drugs, Medical Devices, and Cosmetics Bill of 2022.
More Related Videos
06:00Author Spotlight: Development of a Smartphone-Enhanced Paper-Based Device for Rapid Dengue NS1 Detection
Published on: January 26, 2024
13:42Dry Film Photoresist-based Electrochemical Microfluidic Biosensor Platform: Device Fabrication, On-chip Assay Preparation, and System Operation
Published on: September 19, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Drug Regulation
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Bacterial Signaling
Drug Control Governance: Regulatory Bodies and Their Impact
Clinical Trials: Overview