Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2025

Author Spotlight: Deciphering Coagulation Disorders in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients
Published on: August 4, 2023
In vitro evaluation of global coagulation potential of emicizumab and warfarin using rotational thromboelastometry
Takahiro Kajimoto1, Yuto Nakajima2, Nobuyuki Tsujii1
1Department of Pediatrics, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan.
Warfarin inhibits the generation of vitamin K-dependent proteins and emicizumab can prevent bleeding episodes in people with hemophilia A (PwHA), but their combined hemostatic potential remains unclear. We analyzed the coagulation potential of emicizumab combined with warfarin in a simulated model of PwHA. Nineteen samples were collected from ten patients taking warfarin, and the prothrombin time-international normalized ratio (PT-INR) was used to define near-normal (INR 1.2-1.48; n = 4), subtherapeutic (INR 1.56-1.9; n = 7) and therapeutic (INR > 2.0; n = 8) groups. Factor (F)VIII activity (FVIII:C) was neutralized using an anti-FVIII inhibitor antibody (termed FVIII-depleted) before the addition of emicizumab (50 µg/mL). Coagulation potential was measured using Ca2 + -triggered rotational thromboelastometry, and was compared with that in emicizumab-treated PwHA. The average PT-INR in the near-normal, subtherapeutic, and therapeutic groups was 1.3 ± 0.1, 1.7 ± 0.1, and 2.4 ± 0.3, respectively. The hemostatic potential in FVIII-depleted samples mixed with emicizumab in the near-normal group was comparable to that in emicizumab-treated PwHA. The coagulation potential in FVIII-depleted samples after addition of emicizumab in the subtherapeutic and therapeutic groups were lower than that in emicizumab-treated PwHA. PT-INR monitoring could be informative in emicizumab-treated PwHA due to the influence of vitamin K-dependent proteins.
Warfarin inhibits the generation of vitamin K-dependent proteins and emicizumab can prevent bleeding episodes in people with hemophilia A (PwHA), but their combined hemostatic potential remains unclear. We analyzed the coagulation potential of emicizumab combined with warfarin in a simulated model of PwHA. Nineteen samples were collected from ten patients taking warfarin, and the prothrombin time-international normalized ratio (PT-INR) was used to define near-normal (INR 1.2-1.48; n = 4), subtherapeutic (INR 1.56-1.9; n = 7) and therapeutic (INR > 2.0; n = 8) groups. Factor (F)VIII activity (FVIII:C) was neutralized using an anti-FVIII inhibitor antibody (termed FVIII-depleted) before the addition of emicizumab (50 µg/mL). Coagulation potential was measured using Ca2 + -triggered rotational thromboelastometry, and was compared with that in emicizumab-treated PwHA. The average PT-INR in the near-normal, subtherapeutic, and therapeutic groups was 1.3 ± 0.1, 1.7 ± 0.1, and 2.4 ± 0.3, respectively. The hemostatic potential in FVIII-depleted samples mixed with emicizumab in the near-normal group was comparable to that in emicizumab-treated PwHA. The coagulation potential in FVIII-depleted samples after addition of emicizumab in the subtherapeutic and therapeutic groups were lower than that in emicizumab-treated PwHA. PT-INR monitoring could be informative in emicizumab-treated PwHA due to the influence of vitamin K-dependent proteins.

