Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 9, 2025

Identification of Rare Bacterial Pathogens by 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing and MALDI-TOF MS
Published on: July 11, 2016
Comprehensive comparison of the third-generation sequencing tools for bacterial 6mA profiling
Beifang Lu1, Zhihao Guo2, Xudong Liu2
1Department of Biomedical Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Abstract:
DNA N6-methyladenine (6mA) serves as an intrinsic and principal epigenetic marker in prokaryotes, impacting various biological processes. To date, limited advanced sequencing technologies and analyzing tools are available for bacterial DNA 6mA. Here, we evaluate eight tools designed for the 6mA identification or de novo methylation detection. This assessment includes Nanopore (R9 and R10), Single-Molecule Real-Time (SMRT) Sequencing, and cross-reference with 6mA-IP-seq and DR-6mA-seq. Our multi-dimensional evaluation report encompasses motif discovery, site-level accuracy, single-molecule accuracy, and outlier detection across six bacteria strains. While most tools correctly identify motifs, their performance varies at single-base resolution, with SMRT and Dorado consistently delivering strong performance. Our study indicates that existing tools cannot accurately detect low-abundance methylation sites. Additionally, we introduce an optimized method for advancing 6mA prediction, which substantially improves the detection performance of Dorado. Overall, our study provides a robust and detailed examination of computational tools for bacterial 6mA profiling, highlighting insights for further tool enhancement and epigenetic research.
Related Concept Videos
Next-generation Sequencing
Next-Generation Sequencing Methods
Although all next-generation methods use different technologies, they all share a set of standard features....
Sanger Sequencing
RNA-seq
Before the discovery of RNA-seq, microarray-based methods and Sanger sequencing were used for transcriptome analysis. However, while...

