Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Genome Annotation and Assembly

Genome Annotation and Assembly

The genome refers to all of the genetic material in an organism. It can range from a few million base pairs in microbial cells to several billion base pairs in many eukaryotic organisms. Genome assembly refers to the process of taking the DNA sequencing data and putting it all back together in a correct order to create a close representation of the original genome. This is followed by the identification of functional elements on the newly assembled genome, a process called genome annotation.

RNA-seq

RNA-seq

RNA sequencing, or RNA-Seq, is a high-throughput sequencing technology used to study the transcriptome of a cell. Transcriptomics helps to interpret the functional elements of a genome and identify the molecular constituents of an organism. Additionally, it also helps in understanding the development of an organism and the occurrence of diseases.
Before the discovery of RNA-seq, microarray-based methods and Sanger sequencing were used for transcriptome analysis. However, while...

Chromatin Position Affects Gene Expression

Chromatin Position Affects Gene Expression

Chromatin is the massive complex of DNA and proteins packaged inside the nucleus. The complexity of chromatin folding and how it is packaged inside the nucleus greatly influences access to genetic information. Generally, the nucleus' periphery is considered transcriptionally repressive, while the cell's interior is considered a transcriptionally active area.
Topologically Associated Domains (TADs)
The 3-dimensional positioning of chromatin in the nucleus influences the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

The gift of novelty: repeat-robust k-mer-based estimators of mutation rates.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026

Same author

A k-mer-based estimator of the substitution rate between repetitive sequences.

Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB·2026

Same author

Noncanonical chromosomal-end-specific telomeric repeat arrays in naturally telomerase-negative yeasts.

Nucleic acids research·2026

Same author

Hash functions in nucleotide sequence analysis.

Genome research·2026

Same author

Estimation of substitution and indel rates via <i>k</i>-mer statistics.

Algorithms in bioinformatics : ... International Workshop, WABI ..., proceedings. WABI (Workshop)·2026

Same author

A k-mer-Based Estimator of the Substitution Rate Between Repetitive Sequences.

Algorithms in bioinformatics : ... International Workshop, WABI ..., proceedings. WABI (Workshop)·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 9, 2025

Immunostaining for DNA Modifications: Computational Analysis of Confocal Images

Immunostaining for DNA Modifications: Computational Analysis of Confocal Images

Published on: September 7, 2017

Efficient Analysis of Annotation Colocalization Accounting for Genomic Contexts.

Askar Gafurov¹, Tomáš Vinař², Paul Medvedev^3,4,5

¹Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Mathematics, Physics and Informatics, Comenius University in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia.

Research in Computational Molecular Biology : ... Annual International Conference, RECOMB ... : Proceedings. RECOMB (Conference : 2005- )

|April 29, 2025

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new Markov chain model and algorithm for statistically comparing genomic annotations. The improved method enhances accuracy and efficiency, correcting for genomic context biases like GC content.

Keywords:

Markov chains colocalization genome annotation

More Related Videos

Tracking Drug-induced Changes in Receptor Post-internalization Trafficking by Colocalizational Analysis

Tracking Drug-induced Changes in Receptor Post-internalization Trafficking by Colocalizational Analysis

Published on: July 3, 2015

Annotation of Plant Gene Function via Combined Genomics, Metabolomics and Informatics

Annotation of Plant Gene Function via Combined Genomics, Metabolomics and Informatics

Published on: June 17, 2012

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 9, 2025

Immunostaining for DNA Modifications: Computational Analysis of Confocal Images

Immunostaining for DNA Modifications: Computational Analysis of Confocal Images

Published on: September 7, 2017

Tracking Drug-induced Changes in Receptor Post-internalization Trafficking by Colocalizational Analysis

Tracking Drug-induced Changes in Receptor Post-internalization Trafficking by Colocalizational Analysis

Published on: July 3, 2015

Annotation of Plant Gene Function via Combined Genomics, Metabolomics and Informatics

Annotation of Plant Gene Function via Combined Genomics, Metabolomics and Informatics

Published on: June 17, 2012

Area of Science:

Genomics
Bioinformatics
Computational Biology

Background:

Genomic annotations represent functional or property-based genomic regions.
Comparing annotations to identify enrichment or depletion is a common bioinformatics task.
Existing null models may not fully account for genomic context, potentially biasing results.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop a statistically robust method for comparing genomic annotations.
To introduce a novel null model incorporating genomic context using Markov chains.
To improve the efficiency and accuracy of p-value estimation for annotation comparisons.

Main Methods:

Proposed a new null model based on a Markov chain that accounts for genomic contexts (e.g., GC content, sequencing gaps).
Developed an algorithm for p-value estimation using exact expectation and variance with normal approximation.
Algorithm offers linear/quasi-linear running time, handles multiple test statistics, and supports context-dependent models.

Main Results:

The new algorithm significantly improves computational efficiency over previous methods.
Demonstrated accuracy on synthetic and real genomic datasets, including the human T2T assembly.
Incorporating genomic contexts corrected for GC-bias, leading to revised interpretations of some findings.

Conclusions:

The developed algorithm provides a more accurate and efficient approach to assessing statistical significance in genomic annotation comparisons.
The use of context-dependent null models is crucial for reducing bias and obtaining reliable results.
This method has broad applicability in genomics research, aiding in the interpretation of complex genomic data.