Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 9, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancements in X-ray CT Tool Chain for Tree Core Analysis
Published on: September 22, 2023
Tree Architecture and Structural Complexity in Mountain Forests of the Annapurna Region, Himalaya
Smita Das1, Prakash Basnet2, Dominik Seidel2,3
1Tropical Silviculture and Forest Ecology University of Göttingen Gottingen Germany.
Abstract:
Mountain ranges comprise heterogeneous environments and high plant diversity, but little is known about the architecture and structural complexity of trees in mountain forests. We studied the relationship between tree architecture, environmental conditions, and tree structural complexity in forests of the Annapurna region in the Himalaya. We further asked whether and how tree structural complexity translates into forest stand structural complexity. The study covers 546 trees on 14 undisturbed study plots across wide ranges of elevation (1300 to 3400 m asl.) and annual precipitation (1180 to 3600 mm yr.-1). They were assessed by ground-based mobile laser scanning. We found that tree structural complexity, expressed as box-dimension (D ), was lowest for the needle-leaved Pinus wallichiana and highest for the broad-leaved Daphniphyllum himalense. A high share of the variation in D was explained by tree architecture. In multivariate models, tree height, crown radius, and crown length explained more than 60% of the observed variation in D . Stem density of the plot accounted for 19% of the variation in D , and there was no influence of tree diversity. Precipitation explained l3% of the observed variation in tree D , but elevation and slope did not have significant influences. As expected, tree height decreased with increasing elevation, but small trees often had relatively high D values. The standard deviation of tree-level D within a plot explained 47% of the variation in stand-level structural complexity among plots, surpassing the maximum tree-level D . This suggests that both the sole removal of small or large trees would reduce the stand-level complexity by 36%. We conclude that in the Himalayan forests, species identity and tree architecture play a significant role in determining tree structural complexity, while environmental factors have a smaller role. Furthermore, structural variation among the trees within a plot plays a crucial role for the structural complexity at the stand level.
Related Concept Videos
Survival Tree
Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...
Softwoods and Hardwoods
Structural Classification of Joints
A fibrous joint is where the adjacent bones are united by fibrous connective...
Structural Properties and Dimensions of Lumber
The strength characteristics of...
Phylogenetic Trees
Introduction to Wood
The structural integrity of the...

