Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping02:05

Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping

38.6K
People can go to great lengths to protect their self-image and present themselves in ways that they want others to see them. Sociologist Erving Goffman presented the idea that a person is like an actor on a stage. Calling his theory dramaturgy, Goffman believed that we use “impression management” to present ourselves to others as we hope to be perceived. Each situation is a new scene, and individuals perform different roles depending on who is present (Goffman, 1959). Think about...
38.6K
Self-Discrepancy Theory02:45

Self-Discrepancy Theory

18.2K
One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.  
18.2K
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies02:09

Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies

37.2K
When we hold a stereotype about a person, we have expectations that he or she will fulfill that stereotype. A self-fulfilling prophecy is an expectation held by a person that alters his or her behavior in a way that tends to make it true. When we hold stereotypes about a person, we tend to treat the person according to our expectations. This treatment can influence the person to act according to our stereotypic expectations, thus confirming our stereotypic beliefs. Research by Rosenthal and...
37.2K
Bias01:22

Bias

3.7K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
3.7K
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification03:00

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

5.1K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
5.1K
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

22.8K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
22.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reviewers are better equipped to detect fraud than editors.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Artificial wetlands as tools for frog conservation: stability and variability of reproduction characteristics in Sahara frog populations in Tunisian man-made lakes.

Environmental science and pollution research international·2017
Same author

Effects of temperature, density and food quality on larval growth and metamorphosis in the north African green frog Pelophylax saharicus.

Journal of thermal biology·2014
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 9, 2025

Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research
04:50

Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research

Published on: August 4, 2023

941

Reputation shortcoming in academic publishing.

Rémi Neveu1, André Neveu2

  • 1affiliated to Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique (GATE LSE), Ecully, France.

Plos One
|April 29, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Scientific journal editors

More Related Videos

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
05:02

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

30.9K
Author Spotlight: Marmoset Research - Scope and Challenges
04:52

Author Spotlight: Marmoset Research - Scope and Challenges

Published on: June 9, 2023

1.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 9, 2025

Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research
04:50

Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research

Published on: August 4, 2023

941
Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
05:02

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

30.9K
Author Spotlight: Marmoset Research - Scope and Challenges
04:52

Author Spotlight: Marmoset Research - Scope and Challenges

Published on: June 9, 2023

1.7K

Area of Science:

  • Scientific publishing
  • Bibliometrics
  • Journal editorial processes

Background:

  • Journal editors' decisions can be influenced by factors beyond manuscript content, such as editor and author reputation.
  • The impact of reputation on scientific publication decisions is not well understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of editor reputation in scientific journal publications.
  • To analyze how journal policies and impact factors affect reputation-driven publication patterns.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of publication data from 33 Nature journals over three decades.
  • Examination of physical and life sciences publications.
  • Correlation analysis of editor networks and author publication histories.

Main Results:

  • Editor reputation is significantly linked to publication outcomes.
  • The implementation of non-financial conflict of interest policies correlated with changes in publication numbers for editors' associates.
  • Journal impact factor also showed associations with publication patterns influenced by reputation.

Conclusions:

  • Reputation plays a notable role in the scientific publication process.
  • Journal policies and impact factor can modify the influence of reputation.
  • Recommendations are proposed for authors and journals to reduce reputation's impact on editorial decisions.