Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Implicit Memories

Implicit Memories

Implicit memories, also known as non-declarative memories, are long-term memories that function outside of conscious awareness. These memories influence behavior and skills without explicit knowledge. This type of memory is evident in tasks like playing tennis, snowboarding, and texting. Implicit memory has three subsystems: procedural memory, conditioning, and priming. This type of memory is essential in various activities, from everyday tasks to specialized skills.
One key aspect of implicit...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Dissociating the behavioral and computational features of implicit motor learning and explicit perturbation detection.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Same author

Dissociating variability from error-based processes in observational learning.

Human movement science·2026

Same author

Imitation performance biases are moderated by perceived accuracy in golf putting.

Scientific reports·2025

Same author

Dual agonist and antagonist muscle vibration produces a bias in end point with no change in variability.

Experimental brain research·2025

Same author

Causal inference, prediction and state estimation in sensorimotor learning.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2025

Same author

The influence of advanced information on co-representation in a shared finger precuing task.

Experimental brain research·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 9, 2025

Assessing Corticospinal Excitability During Goal-Directed Reaching Behavior

Assessing Corticospinal Excitability During Goal-Directed Reaching Behavior

Published on: December 2, 2022

Evidence for an efferent-based prediction contributing to implicit motor adaptation.

Annika Szarka¹, Hyosub E Kim^1,2, J Timothy Inglis¹

¹School of Kinesiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

|April 29, 2025

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Implicit sensorimotor adaptation can occur without proprioceptive feedback. Motor prediction, not just sensory input, drives adaptation, even when movements are simulated, challenging existing models.

More Related Videos

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

Published on: May 3, 2018

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface

Published on: May 8, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 9, 2025

Assessing Corticospinal Excitability During Goal-Directed Reaching Behavior

Assessing Corticospinal Excitability During Goal-Directed Reaching Behavior

Published on: December 2, 2022

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

Published on: May 3, 2018

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface

Published on: May 8, 2021

Area of Science:

Neuroscience
Motor Control
Human Movement Science

Background:

Sensorimotor adaptation models often rely on sensory error signals.
Proprioception is considered a primary source for these error signals.
The role of efferent-based motor prediction in adaptation requires further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate implicit sensorimotor adaptation by dissociating afferent and efferent information.
To determine if adaptation occurs without direct proprioceptive feedback of hand position.
To compare adaptation levels in isometric versus actual reaching movements.

Main Methods:

Participants performed isometric force control tasks towards visual targets with a rotated cursor feedback.
Afferent proprioceptive feedback was manipulated by preventing actual hand movement.
Efferent motor predictions were inferred from the intended movement direction.

Main Results:

Significant implicit adaptation was observed in the isometric task, even without hand movement.
Adaptation levels in the isometric task were nearly double those in a typical clamped reaching paradigm.
Actual reaching movements resulted in significantly less adaptation compared to the isometric task.

Conclusions:

Afferent proprioceptive feedback is not essential for inducing implicit sensorimotor adaptation.
Efferent-based motor prediction plays a crucial role in driving adaptation.
Findings challenge existing models that emphasize sensory feedback as the sole driver of adaptation.