Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Murine Model of Wound Healing
Published on: May 28, 2013
Inter-species differences in wound-healing rate: a comparative study involving primates and rodents
Akiko Matsumoto-Oda1, Daisuke Utsumi2, Kenzo Takahashi3
1Graduate School of Tourism Sciences, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa, Japan.
None:
Injuries, which affect survival and biological functioning, are common in the animal kingdom. This study systematically investigated whether the slow wound healing observed in humans is a unique characteristic within the primate order. First, we found no significant difference in wound-healing rates between baboons under experimental conditions and those in their natural environment (0.613 mm d-1). Second, comparisons among four non-human primates (velvet monkeys, Sykes' monkeys, baboons and chimpanzees) revealed no significant differences in wound-healing rates. Furthermore, these rates showed no significant differences compared to those observed in rodents, suggesting a potential commonality in wound-healing rates across diverse animal species. In contrast, human wound-healing rates were found to be markedly slower (0.25 mm d-1), approximately three times slower than those observed in non-human primates. This finding indicates that the slow wound healing observed in humans is not a common characteristic among primate order and highlights the possibility of evolutionary adaptations in humans. Understanding these inter-species differences in wound-healing rates may provide valuable insights into the evolutionary implications of wound healing. This study also underscores the need for further research into the biological processes underlying wound healing in various species.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Overview of Regeneration and Repair
Regeneration
All animals have varying degrees of...
Testing a Claim about Mean: Unknown Population SD
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be approximately normally distributed. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. There is no specific requirement for sample size. But if the sample size is less than 30, and we don't know the population standard deviation, a different approach is used; instead...

