Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 9, 2025

Interaction between Phonological and Semantic Processes in Visual Word Recognition using Electrophysiology
Published on: June 29, 2021
The bestersell effect: Nuances in positional encoding of morphemes in visual word recognition
Jasmine Spencer1,2, Hasibe Kahraman3,4, Elisabeth Beyersmann3,4
1School of Psychological Sciences, Macquarie University, Australian Hearing Hub, 16 University Avenue, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia. jasmine.spencer@mq.edu.au.
Morphemes like suffixes are more flexible in English word processing than previously thought. Even when suffixes appear in unusual positions, the brain can still recognize them, challenging strict positional encoding theories.
Area of Science:
- Psycholinguistics
- Cognitive Science
- Linguistics
Background:
- Previous research indicated strict positional constraints for affixes in English word recognition.
- Stem morphemes are recognized regardless of position, but prefixes and suffixes typically require specific locations (initial/final).
- Words with multiple affixes suggest affixes can appear in atypical positions while retaining meaning.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the positional encoding of mid-embedded suffixes in English words.
- To determine if suffixes in non-typical positions are processed differently than those in typical positions.
- To challenge existing models of morphological processing regarding affix positional constraints.
Main Methods:
- Two lexical decision experiments were conducted with 90 native English-speaking participants each.
- Nonwords with transposed mid-embedded suffixes and string-initial suffixes were compared against orthographic controls.
- Stimuli included transposed tri-morphemic nonwords and nonwords with string-initial suffixes.
Main Results:
- A significantly larger morpheme transposition effect was observed for mid-embedded suffixes compared to string-initial suffixes.
- Nonwords like 'bestersell' (derived from 'bestseller') activated the correct lexical representation, hindering rejection.
- Suffixes demonstrated greater positional flexibility than previously assumed.
Conclusions:
- Suffixes are not as strictly positionally encoded as previously believed.
- The findings challenge current predictions of positional requirements for affixes in morphological processing.
- More nuanced theoretical models are needed to account for affix processing in atypical locations.
More Related Videos
07:36Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
Published on: November 30, 2018
06:48Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment
Published on: June 25, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Encoding
Automatic processing involves the encoding of details like time, space, frequency, and the meaning of words, usually done without conscious...
Directional Terms
Tip-of-the-Tongue Phenomenon
Lateralization
Chunking and Rehearsal in Sensory Memory
Anatomy of the Eyeball