Application of deep learning reconstruction combined with time-resolved post-processing method to improve image
Jiajing Tong1, Tong Su1, Yu Chen2
1Department of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, No.1 Shuaifuyuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Background:
To assess the effect of the combination of deep learning reconstruction (DLR) and time-resolved maximum intensity projection (tMIP) or time-resolved average (tAve) post-processing method on image quality of CTA derived from low-dose cerebral CTP.
Methods:
Thirty patients underwent regular dose CTP (Group A) and other thirty with low-dose (Group B) were retrospectively enrolled. Group A were reconstructed with hybrid iterative reconstruction (R-HIR). In Group B, four image datasets of CTA were gained: L-HIR, L-DLR, L-DLRtMIP and L-DLRtAve. The CT attenuation, image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and subjective images quality were calculated and compared. The Intraclass Correlation (ICC) between CTA and MRA of two subgroups were calculated.
Results:
The low-dose group achieved reduction of radiation dose by 33% in single peak arterial phase and 18% in total compared to the regular dose group (single phase: 0.12 mSv vs 0.18 mSv; total: 1.91mSv vs 2.33mSv). The L-DLRtMIP demonstrated higher CT values in vessels compared to R-HIR (all P < 0.05). The CNR of vessels in L-HIR were statistically inferior to R-HIR (all P < 0.001). There was no significant different in image noise and CNR of vessels between L-DLR and R-HIR (all P > 0.05, except P = 0.05 for CNR of ICAs, 77.19 ± 21.64 vs 73.54 ± 37.03). However, the L-DLRtMIP and L-DLRtAve presented lower image noise, higher CNR (all P < 0.05) and subjective scores (all P < 0.001) in vessels than R-HIR. The diagnostic accuracy in Group B was excellent (ICC = 0.944).
Conclusion:
Combining DLR with tMIP or tAve allows for reduction in radiation dose by about 33% in single peak arterial phase and 18% in total in CTP scanning, while further improving image quality of CTA derived from CTP data when compared to HIR.
