Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 9, 2025

10:28
Dynamic Digital Biomarkers of Motor and Cognitive Function in Parkinson's Disease
Published on: July 24, 2019
15.0K
Prediction intervals and bands with improved coverage for functional data under noisy discrete observation.
1Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia.
Journal of Applied Statistics
|April 30, 2025
Summary
Functional data analysis prediction intervals often lack coverage. A novel method improves coverage by accounting for spline estimator uncertainty, enhancing prediction region reliability for individual curves.
Area of Science:
- Statistics
- Functional Data Analysis
Background:
- Functional data analysis (FDA) involves analyzing curves observed at discrete, irregular points with noise.
- Reconstructing individual curves using prediction intervals and bands is a key FDA task.
- Standard FDA methods estimate curve properties and use Gaussian assumptions for prediction sets, but often fail to achieve nominal coverage.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the cause of coverage failure in standard FDA prediction sets.
- To propose a computationally feasible method to improve prediction region coverage.
- To extend the method to covariate-adjusted functional models.
Main Methods:
- Estimating mean and covariance functions using penalized splines.
- Deriving conditional distributions under Gaussian assumptions.
- Developing a novel sandwich estimator for spline estimator covariance.
- Sampling from the approximate distribution of spline estimators to account for model uncertainty.
Main Results:
- Identified coverage failure in standard FDA prediction sets as a key issue.
- Proposed a new method that significantly improves prediction region coverage.
- Demonstrated the method's applicability to covariate-adjusted models.
Conclusions:
- The proposed method offers a reliable approach for constructing functional data prediction regions.
- Accounting for spline estimator uncertainty is crucial for accurate prediction intervals.
- This work advances practical applications of functional data analysis.
Related Concept Videos
Prediction Intervals
2.2K
The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
2.2K
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests
2.5K
A goodness-of-fit test is conducted to determine whether the observed frequency values are statistically similar to the frequencies expected for the dataset. Suppose the expected frequencies for a dataset are equal such as when predicting the frequency of any number appearing when casting a die. In that case, the expected frequency is the ratio of the total number of observations (n) to the number of categories (k).
2.5K
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals
5.5K
A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
5.5K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals
2.9K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
2.9K
Censoring Survival Data
40
Survival analysis is a statistical method used to analyze time-to-event data, often employed in fields such as medicine, engineering, and social sciences. One of the key challenges in survival analysis is dealing with incomplete data, a phenomenon known as "censoring." Censoring occurs when the event of interest (such as death, relapse, or system failure) has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period or is otherwise unobservable, and it might have many different...
40
Confidence Intervals
6.0K
An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A...
A...
6.0K

